re all the ad hominems: prend moi tel que je suis
(I won't attribute simple-malice to you for the frequent baseless calumniation of parties unknown; I believe there is another cause.)
Here's someone else who slogs to a different drummer, trusting that her certainty-of-a-negative (correlation) supersedes the (surely-mistaken) assessments of those legions of plodders, not remotely as ept in diagnosis or treatment.
(It is unclear if solipsism per se, is yet a punishable offense, or merely actions which ensue from such an expressed mindset.)
The unnecessary death of a little girl
http://open.salon.co...source=newsletter
Now, as to whether denial of say, 'ongoing planetary disease' may also be conflated within the precedent of Prince v Massachusetts -?- that clearly limns a problem which might stump the USSC, Focus on the Farmily Valuez and other ad hoc institutions of fact or neurasthenia.
I am confident however, that a superior arbiter exists:
the IGM shall be able to conduct this official comparison in exemplary manner (given the many self-attributed virtues of its humbly-brilliant members.)
