IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New You're misreading me.
I simply said that something had to replace horses in large cities. Things that replaced them included trains and subways (powered by steam and later electricity), cable cars, buses, trucks, cars, etc. Yes, there were trains and cable cars and subways before the horses were eliminated.

http://www.apta.com/...tory/mileston.cfm

But it wasn't until electric trains and gasoline and diesel powered vehicles took off that horses became much less popular in cities.

A modern city cannot function with draft animals providing most of the power. Some type of machine had to replace them.

Cheers,
Scott.
New It appears I did misread you
Draft animals and large cities can work, the horse is not one of them. Machines can help but also hinder. Co-operative mechanical delivery to central depots followed by individual delivery by consumers works best. Think NYC no real nead for a car unless leaving the city. Some people like to live like that. Im not one of them. I think waste recycling should be decentralized. Units that collect the waste in a building use it to generate heat and electricity before taking balance elsewhey for further processing would be useful.
New A modern city cannot function
with millions of cars providing most of the power.

Ref: one look at Mexico D.F.
     Hansen predicts new global temperature record in next 4 yrs. - (Another Scott) - (34)
         aw, heck, never you mind - (rcareaga) - (1)
             hansen doesnt give a flying fsck about warming - (boxley)
         There seem to be several candidates for run-away scenario -- - (Ashton)
         <devil's advocate>Look at it this way - (pwhysall) - (12)
             It's the rate of change that's the problem. - (Another Scott) - (11)
                 Hansen can say what he likes. - (pwhysall) - (10)
                     Good points. -NT - (Another Scott)
                     Agreed, the 'geo-psycho'-demographic can't be ignored - (Ashton) - (8)
                         Thought experiment, and a question. - (pwhysall) - (7)
                             It might be useful to look to history. - (Another Scott) - (6)
                                 let me guess, history isnt your strong point. - (boxley) - (5)
                                     Linky. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                         linky backatcha :-) - (boxley) - (3)
                                             You're misreading me. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                 It appears I did misread you - (boxley)
                                                 A modern city cannot function - (mhuber)
         Nother, why do you trust anything this guy puts out? - (boxley) - (17)
             Why? Because he knows what he's talking about. - (Another Scott) - (16)
                 Re: Why? Because he knows what he's talking about. - (boxley) - (15)
                     Got a problem with decimals? - (Ashton) - (14)
                         insignificant lot less than< 20% - (boxley) - (13)
                             If Hansen were looking to get rich, he wouldn't be at NASA. - (Another Scott) - (12)
                                 If hansen wasnt at nasa he would find it hard to get a job - (boxley) - (11)
                                     Hansen's CV - (Another Scott) - (6)
                                         does he believe than c02 belched from a volcano - (boxley) - (5)
                                             We've been through volcanoes multiple times, Box. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                                 nice duck there, -NT - (boxley) - (3)
                                                     .. if you think a duck resembles a coffin-nail, perhaps. -NT - (Ashton) - (2)
                                                         point==missed - (boxley) - (1)
                                                             You, and they, apparently misunderstand the argument. - (Another Scott)
                                     re all the ad hominems: prend moi tel que je suis - (Ashton) - (3)
                                         so lets pretend shall we? - (boxley) - (2)
                                             Is it that you don't read for comprehension - (Ashton) - (1)
                                                 my bad, just saw the pnemonia, HIV causes aids? - (boxley)

Did she think she was going to land in the back of a Pier 1 truck carrying papa-san chairs?
97 ms