IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Got a problem with decimals?
'Insignificant' == insignificant == 'in the noise between accuracy and precision' ==

aka: 'false precision', like:
when the weatherman-doll says, '49.87% likely rain'

Absurd on the face; correct notation: "it's about 50/50."
Remember always: Muricans Are {mostly} innumerate.

The 'number of significant figures' in a conclusion: implies a related degree of precision throughout the calcualtion.

That is a metric which requires that a (summarizing) numerical value does not falsely imply an overall precision greater than: the (statistically-weighted) precision(s) of all measurements from which that 'value' is derived.

In case at hand:
Hit don' mattah ayTall. RTFM.
New insignificant lot less than< 20%
which is the amount the october ice melt was off
your bank account is off by 1 penny that is significant in the overall condition of your bank. When you lose a penny a month and the banker assures you it is an anomaly the fucker is stealin huge. This guy? Like I said the sideshow bob of the global climate change

you RTFM its called history, yesteryear when giraffes and wildebeastes inhabited the sahara. When grapes were cultivated in Labrador and patagonia resembled italy in cultural and agricultural attributes. This shit has happened before and will happen again. Look at what peter is saying, mitigate the changes or watch reruns of waterworld and pray yer gills develop in time. Either way it will happen or not. This guy is a just schill lookin for your buck.
New If Hansen were looking to get rich, he wouldn't be at NASA.
Hansen feels passionately about his life's work. Most people do when they're able to work on things they really care about. Some people are motivated by more than money.

http://seedmagazine....new_scientist.php

Really, Box, you can disagree with him without impugning his motives.

And it would be good if you applied as much skepticism to the critics of anthropomorphic climate change as you do to the experts. I'll get you started:
http://www.sourcewat...e_change_skeptics

:-)

Cheers,
Scott.
New If hansen wasnt at nasa he would find it hard to get a job
I have met scientific types that work in government because they are too fucking blind and stupid about their wrong obsessions to get a job elsewhere. Biologists are not much different.
thanx,
bill
New Hansen's CV
http://www.columbia....hansen_200702.pdf

Idiots don't get elected to the NAS.

Anecdotes aren't evidence, Box.

Cheers,
Scott.
New does he believe than c02 belched from a volcano
is bigger than the same element farted from a car? If so he moves from scientist to priest, CV aside
thanx,
bill
New We've been through volcanoes multiple times, Box.
http://gristmill.gri...6/12/17/223957/72

The fact of the matter is, the sum total of all CO2 out-gassed by active volcanoes amounts to about 1/150th of anthropogenic emissions.


HTH!

Cheers,
Scott.
New nice duck there,
New .. if you think a duck resembles a coffin-nail, perhaps.
New point==missed
the postulation that the c02 element itself is larger, as in size of a single element when emitted from a volcano than the physical size of a single c02 element when emitted from a car exhaust, as proclaimed by some, leaves the realm of science for religion. I was inquiring if the high priest under discussion also held that tenet.
New You, and they, apparently misunderstand the argument.
1) Volcanoes are not a major source of CO2. (They are a major source of SO2, but that's a completely different compound. http://www.temis.nl/aviation/so2.php)

2) CO2 is made of carbon and oxygen. They both have isotopes - atoms with the same number of protons (6 for Carbon, 8 for Oxygen) but different numbers of neutrons. These isotopes have different properties and their ratios in a sample of gas can give lots of information - like whether the carbon was recently part of the atmosphere or whether it was locked up in the Earth for millions of years. The ratio changes because one of the carbon isotopes is radioactive, so the ratio of C14 to C12 changes over time.

http://en.wikipedia....sotopes_of_carbon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen-16
http://www.physicsfo....php/t-29375.html

All of this is known and accepted science. There is no controversy about the physics.

Where it gets complicated is in the details. How are the samples taken? How are they protected from contamination? How are they analyzed? What are the error bars (how accurately are the numbers known, and what is the real precision of the value)?

Cheers,
Scott.
New re all the ad hominems: prend moi tel que je suis
(I won't attribute simple-malice to you for the frequent baseless calumniation of parties unknown; I believe there is another cause.)

Here's someone else who slogs to a different drummer, trusting that her certainty-of-a-negative (correlation) supersedes the (surely-mistaken) assessments of those legions of plodders, not remotely as ept in diagnosis or treatment.
(It is unclear if solipsism per se, is yet a punishable offense, or merely actions which ensue from such an expressed mindset.)

The unnecessary death of a little girl
http://open.salon.co...source=newsletter

Now, as to whether denial of say, 'ongoing planetary disease' may also be conflated within the precedent of Prince v Massachusetts -?- that clearly limns a problem which might stump the USSC, Focus on the Farmily Valuez and other ad hoc institutions of fact or neurasthenia.

I am confident however, that a superior arbiter exists:
the IGM shall be able to conduct this official comparison in exemplary manner (given the many self-attributed virtues of its humbly-brilliant members.)


The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.
-- H.L. Mencken
New so lets pretend shall we?
the broad goes into the hospital with the kid trumpeting to all and sundry that she and the kid has HIV so explain in detail the different medications and steps taken to treat pneumonia in that case that does not apply to a child with pneumonia without aids, anxiously awaiting your reply.
Somehow I imagine the answer is nuffink different
New Is it that you don't read for comprehension
or, that you Can't?


Pneumocystis is an otherwise harmless bacteria that causes pneumonia only in people who are severely compromised by AIDS or other immunologic failures.

Why did Christine Maggiore withhold this critical information?

She did it because she is an activist who believes that HIV does not cause AIDS.



Sheesh ... get thee to a comprehensive Comprehension analyst before you

The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.
-- H.L. Mencken
New my bad, just saw the pnemonia, HIV causes aids?
I thought having unprotected sex with someone who has aids caused aids. Learn something new every day
thanx,
bill
     Hansen predicts new global temperature record in next 4 yrs. - (Another Scott) - (34)
         aw, heck, never you mind - (rcareaga) - (1)
             hansen doesnt give a flying fsck about warming - (boxley)
         There seem to be several candidates for run-away scenario -- - (Ashton)
         <devil's advocate>Look at it this way - (pwhysall) - (12)
             It's the rate of change that's the problem. - (Another Scott) - (11)
                 Hansen can say what he likes. - (pwhysall) - (10)
                     Good points. -NT - (Another Scott)
                     Agreed, the 'geo-psycho'-demographic can't be ignored - (Ashton) - (8)
                         Thought experiment, and a question. - (pwhysall) - (7)
                             It might be useful to look to history. - (Another Scott) - (6)
                                 let me guess, history isnt your strong point. - (boxley) - (5)
                                     Linky. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                         linky backatcha :-) - (boxley) - (3)
                                             You're misreading me. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                 It appears I did misread you - (boxley)
                                                 A modern city cannot function - (mhuber)
         Nother, why do you trust anything this guy puts out? - (boxley) - (17)
             Why? Because he knows what he's talking about. - (Another Scott) - (16)
                 Re: Why? Because he knows what he's talking about. - (boxley) - (15)
                     Got a problem with decimals? - (Ashton) - (14)
                         insignificant lot less than< 20% - (boxley) - (13)
                             If Hansen were looking to get rich, he wouldn't be at NASA. - (Another Scott) - (12)
                                 If hansen wasnt at nasa he would find it hard to get a job - (boxley) - (11)
                                     Hansen's CV - (Another Scott) - (6)
                                         does he believe than c02 belched from a volcano - (boxley) - (5)
                                             We've been through volcanoes multiple times, Box. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                                 nice duck there, -NT - (boxley) - (3)
                                                     .. if you think a duck resembles a coffin-nail, perhaps. -NT - (Ashton) - (2)
                                                         point==missed - (boxley) - (1)
                                                             You, and they, apparently misunderstand the argument. - (Another Scott)
                                     re all the ad hominems: prend moi tel que je suis - (Ashton) - (3)
                                         so lets pretend shall we? - (boxley) - (2)
                                             Is it that you don't read for comprehension - (Ashton) - (1)
                                                 my bad, just saw the pnemonia, HIV causes aids? - (boxley)

Eiks taeae vittun homma nyt riitaeae taestae paeivaestae?
111 ms