IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Politics Forum / As you said, we've been through that before.
Post #297,940
by Another Scott
10/13/08 7:36:47 PM
Reply
New As you said, we've been through that before.
You seem to have forgotten that I argued with you about the legality of the investigation and jurisdiction on Z. The committee had jurisdiction. The Alaska Supreme Court apparently agreed, since they refused to stop it (they'll give their reasons later) - http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=ap5f27TS7328&refer=us

Try again? ;-)

Cheers,
Scott.
Post #297,942
by boxley
10/13/08 8:58:12 PM
Reply
New Once again, you quote that statute that claims
personnel is the vehicle for the complaint then complain that the committee has jurisdiction when it doesnt. Go back and point out in the statute for those actions where the juidiciary committe has any jurisdiction. That is like the federal juidiciary investigating oil and gas shenanigans in the DOE entertaining but useless
thanx,
bill
if lemmy and god had a wrestling match who would win?
Post #297,943
by Another Scott
10/13/08 8:59:17 PM
Reply
New It's on Z. No time now. :-)
Post #297,944
by boxley
10/13/08 9:01:35 PM
Reply
New you failed to make the argument there
to anyones satisfaction but your own, you can flog that dead horse some more or admit you dont really understand alaskan statutes or wait till z comes up and ignore it there, besides I want to see if a 100 line rightshifted thread will crash this servelet :-)
if lemmy and god had a wrestling match who would win?
Post #297,945
by Another Scott
10/13/08 9:06:26 PM
Reply
New We'll see. :-)
Post #297,946
by malraux
Picture of malraux
10/13/08 9:17:31 PM
Reply
New No, it won't.
;-)
Regards,
-scott
<i>Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.</i>
Post #297,953
by boxley
10/13/08 11:42:52 PM
Reply
New you sure?
if lemmy and god had a wrestling match who would win?
Post #297,958
by mvitale
Picture of mvitale
10/14/08 12:11:47 AM
Reply
New Sure.
Or a reasonable semblance thereof. :)
-Mike
     Branchflower report on Palin released. - (Another Scott) - (30) - Oct. 10, 2008, 08:44:18 PM EDT
         wrong cut, try section 2 :-) -NT - (boxley) - (28) - Oct. 10, 2008, 09:13:23 PM EDT
             Don't think so. - (Another Scott) - (27) - Oct. 10, 2008, 09:39:16 PM EDT
                 not hardly, what personal benefit - (boxley) - (10) - Oct. 10, 2008, 10:13:12 PM EDT
                     You're drinking too much Kool-Aid. Read the report. :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - (9) - Oct. 10, 2008, 10:14:26 PM EDT
                         in about 3 minutes I will thrashers beating the caps 7-4 -NT - (boxley) - Oct. 10, 2008, 10:17:16 PM EDT
                         okay, page 18 paragraph 7, 7yrs in jail for offences - (boxley) - (7) - Oct. 10, 2008, 11:19:28 PM EDT
                             Some of the things I noticed. - (Another Scott) - (6) - Oct. 10, 2008, 11:45:43 PM EDT
                                 loverly weaseling - (boxley) - (5) - Oct. 10, 2008, 11:50:08 PM EDT
                                     Have you read Mudflats about it? - (Another Scott) - (4) - Oct. 11, 2008, 12:02:00 AM EDT
                                         you need to drink some coffee, did you read what they passed - (boxley) - (3) - Oct. 11, 2008, 09:30:02 AM EDT
                                             I don't like coffee. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Oct. 11, 2008, 09:47:15 AM EDT
                                                 Re: I don't like coffee. - (boxley) - (1) - Oct. 11, 2008, 10:32:09 AM EDT
                                                     Where you stand depends on where you sit. - (Another Scott) - Oct. 11, 2008, 01:03:38 PM EDT
                 There was no legal violation in the report - (beepster) - (15) - Oct. 13, 2008, 02:02:01 PM EDT
                     Eh? - (Another Scott) - (14) - Oct. 13, 2008, 03:55:51 PM EDT
                         what did the personeel board rule and when did they rule it - (boxley) - Oct. 13, 2008, 05:02:07 PM EDT
                         Do you see who has to determine the violation? - (beepster) - (12) - Oct. 13, 2008, 05:02:40 PM EDT
                             thats not how it works when a democrat accuses you -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Oct. 13, 2008, 05:43:15 PM EDT
                                 They spent so much time talking about it - (beepster) - Oct. 13, 2008, 06:28:50 PM EDT
                             The investigator reported his findings. - (Another Scott) - (9) - Oct. 13, 2008, 06:41:27 PM EDT
                                 That wasnt the shouting above here - (boxley) - (8) - Oct. 13, 2008, 07:09:49 PM EDT
                                     As you said, we've been through that before. - (Another Scott) - (7) - Oct. 13, 2008, 07:36:47 PM EDT
                                         Once again, you quote that statute that claims - (boxley) - (6) - Oct. 13, 2008, 08:58:12 PM EDT
                                             It's on Z. No time now. :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - (5) - Oct. 13, 2008, 08:59:17 PM EDT
                                                 you failed to make the argument there - (boxley) - (4) - Oct. 13, 2008, 09:01:35 PM EDT
                                                     We'll see. :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Oct. 13, 2008, 09:06:26 PM EDT
                                                     No, it won't. - (malraux) - (2) - Oct. 13, 2008, 09:17:31 PM EDT
                                                         you sure? -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Oct. 13, 2008, 11:42:52 PM EDT
                                                             Sure. - (mvitale) - Oct. 14, 2008, 12:11:47 AM EDT
         talking about that confict of interest thingy - (boxley) - Oct. 10, 2008, 09:32:32 PM EDT

You are so wrong philosophers weep at the sound of your voice.
121 ms