IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New I'm revisting this, but still may not jump yet.
The lower priced 32" sets are starting to look more appealing, and there are even 1080p 32" LCD sets now (Sharp). But there seems to be a lot going on in the electronics that don't show up in the common reviews.

E.g. I've looked briefly at the sets at the local Target. They have Olevia, Westinghouse, Philips, Sony and maybe a couple of other brands. It's not clear whether they're displaying HD content (they're Target ads), but there's a vast difference in the picture quality. I seem to be especially sensitive to digital artifacts. The thing I especially notice is the jagged edges between regions on the screen of different colors. The Olevia sets look horrible, especially with motion. The Sony sets look much, much better, but not as good as an analog set in this respect. Of course, the Sony sets cost $500 or so more...

An obvious problem with a purchase like this is that you don't know how the sets were tuned (if at all), and you don't know how they'll look with standard NTSC TV or non-HD cable, by looking in stores. Relying on revies on the web seems just as prone to error. It's sort-of a crap shoot.

Any recent pearls of wisdom?

Thanks.

Cheers,
Scott.
[link|http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=006978452673906630972%3A_5xhnlvpsn4|IWeThey Custom Search Engine]
New LCD refresh rates
major weakness of LCD tech. Fast motion will give artifacts.

Best bet is still plasma. LCD prices are dropping faster but if you're going to go high def, plasma is still the better picture.

Too much of today's music is fashionable crap dressed as artistry.Adrian Belew
New Plasma is The Suxxorz if you're a ham radio operator.
Great little RFI/EMI generators and they can't be "fixed".

I'll stick with LCD, thank you.
New 32" is the biggest that'll fit in our bedroom.
AFAIK, there aren't any 32" plasma sets.

The artifacts I'm talking about aren't just a refresh rate issue, but I'm sure that's also a consideration. The stuff I was seeing on the Olevia apparently was [link|http://www.highdefinitionblog.com/?page_id=101|mosquito noise and jaggies], but it was more than that. There was almost a halo on each side of a pronounced color line. It was terrible.

There was talk of 120 Hz LCDs a year or more ago, but I haven't checked into them. Let's see... [link|http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/home-entertainment/guide-to-120hz-hdtvs-which-sets-have-that-magic-number-233642.php|it looks like it'll be out of my price range for a while]. ;-)

While plasma has some advantages in dynamic range, I really wonder about the long-term reliability of the display technology, though they have gotten better. [link|http://www.greathometheater.com/LCD-vs-PLASMA.html|LCDs take less power though].

Thanks.

Cheers,
Scott.
[link|http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=006978452673906630972%3A_5xhnlvpsn4|IWeThey Custom Search Engine]
New It's a crapshoot.
My Dad is interested in upgrading his 51cm 4:3 TV to a widescreen model. Digital tuner is optional; a set-top box will do him nicely. But he has a problem with the quality of the picture on all the LCD panels he has so far seen. I don't blame him: his mother bought a largish LCD TV for her bedroom and the picture is hugely over-processed. But it's hard to know if it's panel doing it because she had a digital cable box plugged into it.

For comparison, the pic on my MythTV box from the digital tuner is gorgeous. Artifacts only crop up when there are signal glitches. So it's looking like over-processing is rampant on LCD TVs. I told Dad he needs to start saying that to the salesmen. (Maybe I should get him to write to Choice magazine... if they pick up on it, there will be trouble in the marketplace...) So he's sort-of looking for a not-too-large widescreen CRT.

Wade.


Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed
 
Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary
Please



-- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne.

· my ·
· [link|http://staticsan.livejournal.com/|blog] ·
· [link|http://yceran.org/|website] ·

New OT: what do you use for output on your Myth box?
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New Ummm...
(ducks head...) a 46cm TV with a composite-in video socket... from a GeForce 6200.

So I guess that probably doesn't really qualify as 'gorgeous', but it has to be said that the image out of MythTV is quite a bit better than the GNOME desktop behind it. Even at 800x600 on a PAL signal. And definitely better than our otherwise average analogue reception.

Oh and the composite encoder on the 6200 is really very good*. I happen to have an expensive VGA->PAL converter that I plugged in once out of curiosity and I was surprised to see the picture was actually no better.

Wade.


Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed
 
Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary
Please



-- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne.

· my ·
· [link|http://staticsan.livejournal.com/|blog] ·
· [link|http://yceran.org/|website] ·

New Thanks.
I'm using the Haupauge 350's out, which is great, but unfortunately MythTV is moving to OpenGL for its OSD, and the Haupauge doesn't support OpenGL. :-/
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New That sucks...
Wonder if my two Dual 500s will will last much longer.

I haven't updated in a LONG while, so I haven't done any reading.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
PGP key: 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05
Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0  2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C
Alternate Fingerprint: 09F9 1102 9D74  E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0
Alternate Fingerprint: 455F E104 22CA  29C4 933F 9505 2B79 2AB2
New For best prices wait till January! :)
Alex

Nobody has a more sacred obligation to obey the law than those who make the law. -- Sophocles (496? - 406 BCE)
New There is that. :-)
[link|http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=006978452673906630972%3A_5xhnlvpsn4|IWeThey Custom Search Engine]
New Im thinking projector for the next buy
was at fryes and saw several sub $1k that looked awesome.
thanx,
bill
Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 51 years. meep

reach me at [link|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net]
     Telly Census - (pwhysall) - (46)
         Not me. No plans to either. - (Silverlock)
         Been HD since 2001 - (SpiceWare)
         Resisted for a long while, but will likely in a few months - (Another Scott) - (1)
             Very similar to mine... - (pwhysall)
         /me raises hand - (bepatient)
         HD Here - (jbrabeck)
         Someone left a CRT set here . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
         this is my second hdtv - (boxley)
         Underway. - (static) - (3)
             a 46cm TV a 2inch TV? need to borry a magnifying glass? -NT - (boxley) - (2)
                 46 centimetres is about 17 inches. - (static) - (1)
                     got mili and cent mixed up -NT - (boxley)
         Nope. - (admin)
         I've had a 42" plasma Panasonic since the fall of '05. - (a6l6e6x) - (5)
             Antenna - (andread) - (4)
                 What kind of antenna did you get? -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (3)
                     One of these probably - (bepatient)
                     This One - (andread) - (1)
                         Thanks! -NT - (a6l6e6x)
         Not 'til my current projector dies - (Meerkat)
         Current TV is only a few years old - (tjsinclair) - (2)
             Re: Current TV is only a few years old - (SpiceWare) - (1)
                 Re: Current TV is only a few years old - (tjsinclair)
         Nope. - (inthane-chan)
         Thinking about it; next year, probably. - (CRConrad) - (8)
             They call them "set top converter boxes" here. - (Another Scott) - (6)
                 coming soon to a cable company near you is the - (boxley) - (2)
                     Like this? - (Another Scott) - (1)
                         thats it -NT - (boxley)
                 *cough* Speaking for one of the 22.5 million - - (Ashton) - (2)
                     It's a problem, but there's benefits of changing the TV band - (Another Scott) - (1)
                         Thanks, as usual a pithy and complete summary. - (Ashton)
             Several terms exist. - (static)
         I'm revisting this, but still may not jump yet. - (Another Scott) - (11)
             LCD refresh rates - (bepatient) - (7)
                 Plasma is The Suxxorz if you're a ham radio operator. - (n3jja)
                 32" is the biggest that'll fit in our bedroom. - (Another Scott)
                 It's a crapshoot. - (static) - (4)
                     OT: what do you use for output on your Myth box? -NT - (admin) - (3)
                         Ummm... - (static) - (2)
                             Thanks. - (admin) - (1)
                                 That sucks... - (folkert)
             For best prices wait till January! :) -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (1)
                 There is that. :-) -NT - (Another Scott)
             Im thinking projector for the next buy - (boxley)
         All I know... - (imqwerky)

Zeptotechnology is just around the corner!
157 ms