Told you this two+ years ago.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #295,782 by folkert 11/9/07 12:34:52 AM Reply	Told you this two+ years ago. And you and other scoffed. -- [link\|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net\|greg], [link\|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry\|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ *i_wethey* `PGP key: 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05 Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0 2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C Alternate Fingerprint: 09F9 1102 9D74 E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0 Alternate Fingerprint: 455F E104 22CA 29C4 933F 9505 2B79 2AB2`
Post #295,810 by boxley 11/9/07 10:36:05 AM Reply	not moi Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari? Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 51 years. meep reach me at [link\|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net\|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net]
Post #295,811 by folkert 11/9/07 10:43:10 AM Reply	Oh yes... At the NJ BASH, specifically to you. And I have mentioned them thar things here. -- [link\|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net\|greg], [link\|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry\|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ *i_wethey* `PGP key: 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05 Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0 2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C Alternate Fingerprint: 09F9 1102 9D74 E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0 Alternate Fingerprint: 455F E104 22CA 29C4 933F 9505 2B79 2AB2`
Post #295,826 by Simon_Jester 11/9/07 5:37:56 PM 11/9/07 5:48:55 PM Reply	Doesn't matter. The real question (and I didn't expect it to come up) is whether or not it's legal. Frankly, under US wire tapping law it's not. If Clinton had done this and it was know, he's be run out on the rails. The question is what happens now? --------------------------------------- [On update] This story isn't new btw. It first came out back in 2006. There's still a question of whether or not it's happening (there is only the whistleblower). Finally, the reason why this is coming out now is that the whistleblower is advocating no immunity for the telecos. Which actually make me believe the whistleblower. If the telecos did nothing wrong, why do they need immunity? Edited by Simon_Jester Nov. 9, 2007, 05:48:55 PM EST Expand All History

I knew this but now it is public knowledge - (boxley) - (8) - Nov. 8, 2007, 02:39:00 PM EST

All your bits are belong to us. :-/ -NT - (Another Scott) - Nov. 8, 2007, 02:42:15 PM EST

Re: I knew this but now it is public knowledge - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 8, 2007, 03:08:36 PM EST

voice traffic goes thru the same pipes -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2007, 03:58:03 PM EST

sure thing...they call that "progress" -NT - (bepatient) - Nov. 8, 2007, 06:47:54 PM EST

Told you this two+ years ago. - (folkert) - (3) - Nov. 9, 2007, 12:34:52 AM EST

not moi -NT - (boxley) - (2) - Nov. 9, 2007, 10:36:05 AM EST

Oh yes... - (folkert) - (1) - Nov. 9, 2007, 10:43:10 AM EST

Doesn't matter. - (Simon_Jester) - Nov. 9, 2007, 05:48:55 PM EST

iwethey.org

The tide is high...
41 ms