<man type=straw />

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #293,952

by jb4

9/30/07 10:41:55 PM

You're right, there is no point in continuing...

jb4
"It's hard for me, you know, living in this beautiful White House, to give you a firsthand assessment."
— George W. Bush, when asked if he believed Iraq was in a state of civil war (Newsweek, 26 Feb 07)

More betrayus.... - (Simon_Jester) - (108) - Sept. 30, 2007, 10:17:08 AM EDT

Is he calling our generals traitors? - (Seamus) - Sept. 30, 2007, 10:26:09 AM EDT

a little long on hyperbole - (boxley) - (96) - Sept. 30, 2007, 10:33:43 AM EDT

I don't usually agree with you - (Seamus) - (95) - Sept. 30, 2007, 10:40:52 AM EDT

petraus like macnamara - (boxley) - (94) - Sept. 30, 2007, 08:03:08 PM EDT

What duties are those, Box? - (jb4) - Sept. 30, 2007, 10:40:39 PM EDT

Talk about chicken shit - (Seamus) - Oct. 1, 2007, 12:01:30 AM EDT

Your "will do what his boss tells him" kind of chicken... - (CRConrad) - (91) - Oct. 1, 2007, 03:12:44 AM EDT

so, they are loading iraqis into ovens now? -NT - (boxley) - (90) - Oct. 1, 2007, 09:51:41 AM EDT

No, not as far as I know. Why, does that somehow make... - (CRConrad) - (89) - Oct. 1, 2007, 10:50:04 AM EDT

try reading my original post - (boxley) - (88) - Oct. 1, 2007, 10:55:09 AM EDT

SIGH...It gets more and more wrong. - (CRConrad) - (87) - Oct. 1, 2007, 03:22:57 PM EDT

naw, the germans were cheering all the way thru 1941 - (boxley) - (86) - Oct. 1, 2007, 04:37:11 PM EDT

Uuh... Yes. Logic much, mr Sequitur Strawman? - (CRConrad) - (85) - Oct. 2, 2007, 02:41:43 AM EDT

were you not comparing a point in time? if not - (boxley) - (84) - Oct. 2, 2007, 10:23:31 AM EDT

Two, actually: Germany, 1932, and USA, 2007. - (CRConrad) - (83) - Oct. 2, 2007, 04:20:02 PM EDT

long as we dont invade russia in winter - (boxley) - (82) - Oct. 2, 2007, 08:52:31 PM EDT

WTF is WRONG with you? Are you stoned out of your... - (CRConrad) - (81) - Oct. 3, 2007, 03:59:59 AM EDT

Now THERE is a funny non-seq -NT - (bepatient) - (80) - Oct. 3, 2007, 06:57:15 AM EDT

Non? Seemed to follow pretty directly, dinnit? How not? -NT - (CRConrad) - Oct. 3, 2007, 07:28:17 AM EDT

Nah - (crazy) - (78) - Oct. 3, 2007, 07:42:58 AM EDT

the lady's penchant for petty revenge with all the - (boxley) - (77) - Oct. 3, 2007, 09:53:19 AM EDT

Nope, that still doesn't explain WHY you're so mad. - (CRConrad) - (17) - Oct. 3, 2007, 10:37:10 AM EDT

isnt isnt 28 years of clinton bush enuff? - (boxley) - (3) - Oct. 3, 2007, 11:17:36 AM EDT

Re: isnt isnt 28 years of clinton bush enuff? - (Seamus) - (2) - Oct. 3, 2007, 12:21:56 PM EDT

yer right, it just seemed like 28 years -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Oct. 3, 2007, 06:17:48 PM EDT

It will seem like alot longer, heaven forbid. -NT - (bepatient) - Oct. 3, 2007, 06:35:25 PM EDT

It's because of the pronoun - (Silverlock) - (1) - Oct. 3, 2007, 11:29:57 AM EDT

bullcrap - (boxley) - Oct. 3, 2007, 11:32:08 AM EDT

ms I dont know in charge of the gummint? - (boxley) - (10) - Oct. 3, 2007, 06:43:11 PM EDT

Um, her senior thesis isn't sealed any more. - (Another Scott) - Oct. 3, 2007, 07:59:11 PM EDT

Bravo! Yeah, that's *exactly* what I mean. - (CRConrad) - (8) - Oct. 4, 2007, 05:38:10 AM EDT

Hey, back in the day - My Gramma used to get reams of those - (Ashton) - (1) - Oct. 4, 2007, 07:32:40 AM EDT

Reminds me of a passage in NDCC. - (Another Scott) - Oct. 4, 2007, 07:57:56 AM EDT

funny, you seem ready to convict the current - (boxley) - (5) - Oct. 4, 2007, 09:48:34 AM EDT

When was she named an unindicted co-conspirator? -NT - (Seamus) - Oct. 4, 2007, 10:12:59 AM EDT

Uhh... "slim evidence" for the lies that got you into Iraq? - (CRConrad) - (3) - Oct. 4, 2007, 11:40:54 AM EDT

you gargle yer koolaid this am? - (boxley) - (2) - Oct. 4, 2007, 11:51:13 AM EDT

You're wrong AGAIN! - (CRConrad) - (1) - Oct. 4, 2007, 12:11:44 PM EDT

:-) -NT - (boxley) - Oct. 4, 2007, 12:18:12 PM EDT

As opposed to shrub's penchant for major revenge? - (crazy) - (54) - Oct. 3, 2007, 01:06:23 PM EDT

Fred still says Saddam had WMDs and a nuke program. - (Another Scott) - (53) - Oct. 3, 2007, 01:25:47 PM EDT

box doesn't care - (crazy) - (3) - Oct. 3, 2007, 03:09:43 PM EDT

Perhaps boxley is like me. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Oct. 3, 2007, 03:14:59 PM EDT

I did, once :-) - (imqwerky) - Oct. 3, 2007, 03:16:44 PM EDT

exactly -NT - (boxley) - Oct. 3, 2007, 06:18:48 PM EDT

Heck, alot of folks said that - (bepatient) - (48) - Oct. 3, 2007, 06:50:26 PM EDT

she's a whatever it takes kind of guy - (boxley) - Oct. 3, 2007, 07:51:01 PM EDT

He said it *two days* ago. He hasn't been paying attention. - (Another Scott) - (46) - Oct. 3, 2007, 08:02:56 PM EDT

the same she who admits she didnt read the intel report? -NT - (boxley) - (35) - Oct. 3, 2007, 09:52:16 PM EDT

How many did? - (Another Scott) - (34) - Oct. 3, 2007, 10:13:56 PM EDT

a lazy dimbulb is what we need - (boxley) - (33) - Oct. 4, 2007, 09:50:40 AM EDT

Yeah look at what Reagan did for the country - (Seamus) - (32) - Oct. 4, 2007, 10:01:51 AM EDT

dot com era, end of cold war yup all bad things -NT - (boxley) - (31) - Oct. 4, 2007, 11:23:14 AM EDT

Like the other Bill(Hmm,has anyone seen them both together?) - (CRConrad) - Oct. 4, 2007, 11:46:29 AM EDT

Reagan had nothing to do with the dot com era - (Seamus) - (29) - Oct. 4, 2007, 04:36:27 PM EDT

of course lowering taxes hurt the economy...right -NT - (boxley) - (28) - Oct. 4, 2007, 09:02:14 PM EDT

Reading for comprehension - try it some time - (Seamus) - (7) - Oct. 4, 2007, 09:52:35 PM EDT

Macroeconomics - study it sometime. -NT - (bepatient) - (1) - Oct. 4, 2007, 09:54:29 PM EDT

Wasn't the issue -NT - (Seamus) - Oct. 4, 2007, 09:56:00 PM EDT

reagan had nothing to do with the collapse of the sovs - (boxley) - (4) - Oct. 5, 2007, 09:12:41 AM EDT

Did you even read the paper by Yegor Gaidar? - (Seamus) - (3) - Oct. 5, 2007, 09:28:35 AM EDT

You must have something against - (bepatient) - (2) - Oct. 5, 2007, 10:01:45 AM EDT

No, its believing that you can cut taxes, increase spending - (Seamus) - Oct. 5, 2007, 12:40:59 PM EDT

HOW ROBUST IS THE CURRENT ECONOMIC EXPANSION? (new thread) - (Seamus) - Oct. 5, 2007, 01:05:44 PM EDT

The issue was did Reagan cause the collapse of the USSR - (Seamus) - (8) - Oct. 4, 2007, 10:21:15 PM EDT

can you say disinformatsya? probably not -NT - (boxley) - (7) - Oct. 5, 2007, 09:17:38 AM EDT

I forgot the AEI is all about spreading Russian - (Seamus) - (6) - Oct. 5, 2007, 09:36:19 AM EDT

if they are trying not to repeat past mistakes - (boxley) - (5) - Oct. 5, 2007, 09:45:24 AM EDT

A fear of Soviet control of the middle east wasn't a - (Seamus) - (4) - Oct. 5, 2007, 09:55:39 AM EDT

not for the saudis - (boxley) - (3) - Oct. 5, 2007, 09:59:33 AM EDT

Yeah the huge loss of oil revenue - (Seamus) - (2) - Oct. 5, 2007, 10:44:45 AM EDT

hate to break it to you - (boxley) - (1) - Oct. 5, 2007, 10:48:01 AM EDT

The idea is that the fall of oil prices - (Seamus) - Oct. 5, 2007, 12:31:18 PM EDT

The other issue was that Reagan caused the dot com era - (Seamus) - (10) - Oct. 4, 2007, 10:40:54 PM EDT

Maybe a more neutral source - (Seamus) - (9) - Oct. 4, 2007, 10:52:41 PM EDT

Wow, a complete ignorance of globalization - (bepatient) - (8) - Oct. 5, 2007, 07:32:41 AM EDT

So, what is it you're saying here? - (CRConrad) - (2) - Oct. 5, 2007, 07:58:11 AM EDT

Re: So, what is it you're saying here? - (bepatient) - (1) - Oct. 5, 2007, 09:59:06 AM EDT

The claim was that the Reagan deficits produced the - (Seamus) - Oct. 5, 2007, 10:40:47 AM EDT

A chaired professor and former Dept chairman - (Seamus) - (4) - Oct. 5, 2007, 09:16:46 AM EDT

dunno, alternate theories by walter williams are offered - (boxley) - (3) - Oct. 5, 2007, 09:23:57 AM EDT

Yes, a supply-sider. There the only ones left who - (Seamus) - (2) - Oct. 5, 2007, 09:47:12 AM EDT

well listening to hillary giving away money - (boxley) - (1) - Oct. 5, 2007, 10:45:49 AM EDT

A supply sider is someone who thinks stimulating - (Seamus) - Oct. 5, 2007, 01:24:23 PM EDT

Yes. - (bepatient) - (5) - Oct. 3, 2007, 10:17:54 PM EDT

Not hardly. Fred's an out of touch lightweight. -NT - (Another Scott) - (3) - Oct. 3, 2007, 10:20:25 PM EDT

We'll see if the party machinery can mold him - (bepatient) - (2) - Oct. 4, 2007, 09:04:45 AM EDT

I think the R machinery knows that none of them can win. ;-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Oct. 4, 2007, 10:04:10 AM EDT

They won't get a chance to mold him - (Seamus) - Oct. 4, 2007, 10:04:16 AM EDT

Apparently - (Simon_Jester) - Oct. 4, 2007, 10:07:51 PM EDT

In his defense, from all the transcripts I've seen, he... - (CRConrad) - (3) - Oct. 5, 2007, 02:41:34 AM EDT

Hmmm... - (Another Scott) - (2) - Oct. 5, 2007, 07:50:35 AM EDT

Ok, yup, in *that* sense he was wrong. - (CRConrad) - (1) - Oct. 5, 2007, 08:11:27 AM EDT

I'm not willing to give him a break. - (Another Scott) - Oct. 5, 2007, 08:53:46 AM EDT

Thank youm thank you, thank you! :) - (a6l6e6x) - (3) - Oct. 6, 2007, 04:17:37 PM EDT

Are you sure it wouldn't be...? - (CRConrad) - (2) - Oct. 6, 2007, 06:40:46 PM EDT

It's a legacy of the "Song Title Game". It's not recent. -NT - (Another Scott) - Oct. 6, 2007, 07:37:54 PM EDT

I'm a native European. - (a6l6e6x) - Oct. 6, 2007, 10:52:05 PM EDT

Main difference - (bepatient) - (9) - Sept. 30, 2007, 11:53:24 AM EDT

How much of a difference is this? Not much. -NT - (Seamus) - Sept. 30, 2007, 12:03:45 PM EDT

Actually, I don't believe that... - (Simon_Jester) - (7) - Sept. 30, 2007, 03:11:07 PM EDT

You don't believe an easily recognizable fact? - (bepatient) - (6) - Sept. 30, 2007, 07:31:59 PM EDT

<man type=straw /> - (jb4) - Sept. 30, 2007, 10:41:55 PM EDT

Re: You don't believe an easily recognizable fact? - (Simon_Jester) - (4) - Sept. 30, 2007, 11:35:31 PM EDT

You know... - (bepatient) - (3) - Oct. 1, 2007, 07:08:17 AM EDT

And you determined that how? - (hnick) - (2) - Oct. 1, 2007, 07:43:10 AM EDT

Simple really - (bepatient) - (1) - Oct. 1, 2007, 09:34:39 AM EDT

I do think some of your analysis is correct (new thread) - (Simon_Jester) - Oct. 2, 2007, 09:01:01 AM EDT

iwethey.org

This is actually a variation of the phrase, "HEY MOE."
121 ms