My position as to what is Truth, on various and sundry topics, is very much a matter of public record.So, your opinion on a subject is "The Truth" about that subject.
Hmmmmm, I do believe that is a functional definition of "God".
Truth is that which is the case.No argument there. And 1 + 1 = 2. I didn't ask you to define "truth". I asked what the "Truth" is, accourding to you.
As opposed to that which is not the case.Again, no argument. But you still haven't told me what the "Truth" is. You've just defined what "truth" is and what "truth" is not.
But it's no good saying that, because some people will turn around and ask what "is the case" means.No. Just what the "Truth" is. Phrase it however you want to.
Or what "is" means.It would seem to me that this is EXACTLY what you are doing right now. You are focusing on the definitions of the words rather than answering the question. But I expected such bullshit from you.
In summary, Marlowe hasn't got a clue what "The Truth" is. He has his opinions and he supports those opinions by stating that they are "The Truth". Which is no support at all.
Sorry, Marlowe, you lose.