IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Ask Bally...
They (and a number of others) have been making non-subvertable slot machines of various designs for decades! And they have this thing called the Nevada Gaming Board (now, since gam(bl)ing is basically universal, there are state Gaming Boards all over the place...but it all started there; they are the model). This august body is responsible for overseeing the manufacturers of gam(bl)ing devices, and I know from firsthand experience that they do not fuck around with anybody. You follow the rules, or you're out. Period. And one of the rules is that all your code is available for inspection at any time, and another is that you can only have in your machine code that has been fully certified as fair and balanced.

So any Diebold or anybody else who says it is too costly, or lofgistically impossible, or any of the other oh-so-lame excuses I've heard so far is just plain full of shit.
jb4
"It's hard for me, you know, living in this beautiful White House, to give you a firsthand assessment."
George W. Bush, when asked if he believed Iraq was in a state of civil war (Newsweek, 26 Feb 07)
New No no no... it's about prioritization
see, slots are for making money, so it's a high priority for the state, but electronic voting machines are for democracy, so it's not.
New See, I already thought of that!
They need to do something to tie that together at the ballot box. Like using dollar bills (or coins) to vote. If money is involved that closely with the end voter, they will have an interest in making it secure and accurate.

Wade.


Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed
 
Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary
Please



-- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne.

· my ·
· [link|http://staticsan.livejournal.com/|blog] ·
· [link|http://yceran.org/|website] ·

Expand Edited by static Aug. 20, 2007, 02:41:10 AM EDT
New Uh no: Lobbyists do NOT want! "the public's vote"
'counted' - wherever possible.

And Lobbyists ARE "the US electorate", the "Deciders of purchase price" for each Rep - HTF d'ya think we got so Fucked, so irreversibly?


HTH
;^{

     Electronic Voting decertified in California. - (Andrew Grygus) - (8)
         This should be happy news - (drewk) - (7)
             How many of these systems... - (folkert) - (6)
                 Nope, easy solution - (drewk) - (1)
                     That'd never fly. - (static)
                 Ask Bally... - (jb4) - (3)
                     No no no... it's about prioritization - (jake123) - (2)
                         See, I already thought of that! - (static) - (1)
                             Uh no: Lobbyists do NOT want! "the public's vote" - (Ashton)

Kinda I want to.
178 ms