IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New if you put a linux partition on iSeries
it certainly could do NFSv4
thanx,
bill
Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 51 years. meep

reach me at [link|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net]
New Not what I was asking. And you know that.
I was just wondering if the iSeries OS supported NFSv4.

I KNOW LINUX DOES. Especially with a Kernel after 2.6.19, but even better with 2.6.20.

This works very nicely:
/nfs/data               192.168.1.*(rw,fsid=0,no_root_squash,sync,no_subtree_check)\n/nfs/data/stor          192.168.1.*(rw,wdelay,nohide,insecure,root_squash,no_subtree_check)\n/nfs/data/music         192.168.1.*(rw,wdelay,nohide,insecure,root_squash,no_subtree_check)


And damn its as fast as line speed will allow, except that GigE on Linux really does require TOE NICs, or TCP Offload NICs.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
PGP key: 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05
Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0  2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C
Alternate Fingerprint: 09F9 1102 9D74  E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0
Alternate Fingerprint: 455F E104 22CA  29C4 933F 9505 2B79 2AB2
     NFS or SMB? - (mmoffitt) - (12)
         Interesting - I've never tried it... - (imric) - (6)
             What? - (mmoffitt)
             Do *NOT* use SMB. Use NFS. - (mmoffitt) - (4)
                 Lemme ask... - (folkert) - (3)
                     if you put a linux partition on iSeries - (boxley) - (1)
                         Not what I was asking. And you know that. - (folkert)
                     I did try CIFS. - (mmoffitt)
         I would think it comes down to the server implementation. - (static) - (4)
             No, no, you're doing fine. ;0) - (mmoffitt) - (3)
                 That is due to CIFS vs SMB. - (folkert) - (1)
                     I'm sure it will. - (mmoffitt)
                 Ah... that I don't know. - (static)

This is untested and you're my guinea pig.
37 ms