Yes, yes indeed it is.
Let's be CRYSTAL clear....there is no chance that Democrats will impeach Bush for "spreading lies".
That said, the LIE that EVERYONE bought the argument that Saddam Hussein had WMD and had to be brought down by force is FALSE.
Washington Beltway Names only? Sigh...I can google as well as you can.
"Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to its agreement." -- Barbara Boxer, November 8, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Ted Kennedy, September 27, 2002
"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed." -- Ted Kennedy, Sept 27, 2002
"This December will mark three years since United Nations inspectors last visited Iraq. There is no doubt that since that time, Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to refine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer- range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." -- From a December 6, 2001 letter signed by Bob Graham (et al)
Of course, Kennedy, Boxer and Graham all voted against the resolution to use force. Shrug, go figure. Maybe they wanted a solution other than war?
I haven't even googled for the other 23 Senators who voted against the resolution.
Shrug - btw: for those who care. [link|http://www.thememoryhole.org/war/powell-no-wmd.htm|http://www.thememory...powell-no-wmd.htm]
