Getting interfaces right

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #28,451 by wharris2 2/15/02 4:17:26 AM Reply	Getting interfaces right It boils down to being damned sure you've got the interfaces right the first time. And Microsoft has such a good record of doing that... oh, but forgive me, they also have such a great record of actually publishing their interfaces... Theoretically, OLE/COM modules have built-in versioning, too, but that doesn't stop them from crackling all over every time Microsoft does a system update. Most of the work of government does not need to be done. - Attributed to Ronald Reagan, under whose administration the government expanded, of course.
Post #28,571 by a6l6e6x 2/15/02 8:40:44 PM Reply	When you're innovating at internet speed,... publishing interfaces would only confuse the developers. Where is that sign, again? :) Alex "Of course, you realize this means war." -B. Bunny
Post #28,582 by wharris2 2/15/02 11:25:26 PM Reply	I know the sign, and I endorse it :=) Where each demon is slain, more hate is raised, yet hate unchecked also multiplies. - L. E. Modesitt, from his Recluse series

Good link on .NET - (ben_tilly) - (27) - Feb. 14, 2002, 04:12:13 AM EST

Just confirms it-who couldn't figure as much 1 or 2 yrs ago? -NT - (CRConrad) - Feb. 14, 2002, 09:19:06 AM EST

Stack-based security - (admin) - Feb. 14, 2002, 09:43:24 AM EST

A different .NET link, makes me sick - (bluke) - (3) - Feb. 14, 2002, 03:10:00 PM EST

Some get to be sharks... - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 14, 2002, 06:01:24 PM EST

Blink blink - (wharris2) - Feb. 15, 2002, 04:13:01 AM EST

Dunno if he really believes it, but he has a reason to gush - (CRConrad) - Feb. 15, 2002, 12:52:27 PM EST

.NET Visual Studio - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Feb. 14, 2002, 03:10:31 PM EST

...has at least one security-related compiler bug already - (CRConrad) - Feb. 15, 2002, 01:01:10 PM EST

Sounds about like I expected - (tonytib) - (8) - Feb. 14, 2002, 09:55:36 PM EST

Something nasty that I just realized (oops, I was wrong) - (ben_tilly) - (5) - Feb. 15, 2002, 08:15:35 AM EST

Not sure you are right about the linking part. - (a6l6e6x) - (4) - Feb. 15, 2002, 01:06:55 AM EST

Getting interfaces right - (wharris2) - (2) - Feb. 15, 2002, 04:17:26 AM EST

When you're innovating at internet speed,... - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - Feb. 15, 2002, 08:40:44 PM EST

I know the sign, and I endorse it :=) -NT - (wharris2) - Feb. 15, 2002, 11:25:26 PM EST

D'oh - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 15, 2002, 08:14:49 AM EST

Re: Side note for Ben - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - Feb. 15, 2002, 12:00:57 AM EST

You have to understand the context - (tonytib) - Feb. 15, 2002, 12:47:26 AM EST

I would miss dynamic typing. - (static) - (9) - Feb. 16, 2002, 05:44:20 AM EST

Take your pick - (ben_tilly) - (8) - Feb. 16, 2002, 11:08:12 AM EST

Please, sir... - (static) - (7) - Feb. 19, 2002, 12:25:30 AM EST

Very simple - (ben_tilly) - (6) - Feb. 19, 2002, 02:50:14 AM EST

Versions peresnt during packaging? - (Arkadiy) - (3) - Feb. 19, 2002, 10:02:52 AM EST

No - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Feb. 19, 2002, 11:43:41 AM EST

To do library versioning dynamically... - (neelk) - (1) - Feb. 19, 2002, 12:11:24 PM EST

Huh, interesting - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 20, 2002, 06:54:05 AM EST

Yes, it makes sense now. - (static) - Feb. 20, 2002, 12:32:47 AM EST

Specify prefered libraries up front - (tablizer) - March 1, 2002, 11:15:38 PM EST

He poops from his butt.
212 ms