IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Theory and Practice of Programming Forum / Re: Side note for Ben
Post #28,439
by a6l6e6x
Picture of a6l6e6x
2/15/02 12:00:57 AM
Reply
New Re: Side note for Ben
Tony, the "language that runs in something like 4K program and 4K data memory" is called assembler code! :) I'm assuming there is one for the DSP in question.

Actually, if you don't use functions like printf C can get you pretty close to assembler sized code. General purpose functions like that are incredible memory hogs.
Alex
"Of course, you realize this means war." -B. Bunny
Post #28,440
by tonytib
2/15/02 12:47:26 AM
Reply
New You have to understand the context
The dev tools I'm getting include assembler and C compiler, along with a simple OS and a good sized application specific (imaging) library.

But there are a lot of advantages to combining assembly and C with a scripting language. It's a lot more flexible. So, if I can do it, I will. The only current language that might work for the ADSP21xx DSP seems to be FORTH (and at least two different people have ported FORTH to these chips). The other alternatives are to roll my own (something I'd prefer not to do) or give up.

Tony
     Good link on .NET - (ben_tilly) - (27) - Feb. 14, 2002, 04:12:13 AM EST
         Just confirms it-who couldn't figure as much 1 or 2 yrs ago? -NT - (CRConrad) - Feb. 14, 2002, 09:19:06 AM EST
         Stack-based security - (admin) - Feb. 14, 2002, 09:43:24 AM EST
         A different .NET link, makes me sick - (bluke) - (3) - Feb. 14, 2002, 03:10:00 PM EST
             Some get to be sharks... - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 14, 2002, 06:01:24 PM EST
             Blink blink - (wharris2) - Feb. 15, 2002, 04:13:01 AM EST
             Dunno if he really believes it, but he has a reason to gush - (CRConrad) - Feb. 15, 2002, 12:52:27 PM EST
         .NET Visual Studio - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Feb. 14, 2002, 03:10:31 PM EST
             ...has at least one security-related compiler bug already - (CRConrad) - Feb. 15, 2002, 01:01:10 PM EST
         Sounds about like I expected - (tonytib) - (8) - Feb. 14, 2002, 09:55:36 PM EST
             Something nasty that I just realized (oops, I was wrong) - (ben_tilly) - (5) - Feb. 15, 2002, 08:15:35 AM EST
                 Not sure you are right about the linking part. - (a6l6e6x) - (4) - Feb. 15, 2002, 01:06:55 AM EST
                     Getting interfaces right - (wharris2) - (2) - Feb. 15, 2002, 04:17:26 AM EST
                         When you're innovating at internet speed,... - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - Feb. 15, 2002, 08:40:44 PM EST
                             I know the sign, and I endorse it :=) -NT - (wharris2) - Feb. 15, 2002, 11:25:26 PM EST
                     D'oh - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 15, 2002, 08:14:49 AM EST
             Re: Side note for Ben - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - Feb. 15, 2002, 12:00:57 AM EST
                 You have to understand the context - (tonytib) - Feb. 15, 2002, 12:47:26 AM EST
         I would miss dynamic typing. - (static) - (9) - Feb. 16, 2002, 05:44:20 AM EST
             Take your pick - (ben_tilly) - (8) - Feb. 16, 2002, 11:08:12 AM EST
                 Please, sir... - (static) - (7) - Feb. 19, 2002, 12:25:30 AM EST
                     Very simple - (ben_tilly) - (6) - Feb. 19, 2002, 02:50:14 AM EST
                         Versions peresnt during packaging? - (Arkadiy) - (3) - Feb. 19, 2002, 10:02:52 AM EST
                             No - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Feb. 19, 2002, 11:43:41 AM EST
                                 To do library versioning dynamically... - (neelk) - (1) - Feb. 19, 2002, 12:11:24 PM EST
                                     Huh, interesting - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 20, 2002, 06:54:05 AM EST
                         Yes, it makes sense now. - (static) - Feb. 20, 2002, 12:32:47 AM EST
                         Specify prefered libraries up front - (tablizer) - March 1, 2002, 11:15:38 PM EST

Ahh, the good old days when I didn't know how stupid I was.
103 ms