IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New He's argument on the slam-dunk
was that the case against Hussein was a "slam-dunk"...not that Saddam had WMD.
New That's the point
He was stating emphatically that his stmt wasn't what lead Shrub to invade Iraq, as he felt the administration had been implying. His explanation that the discussion where he made the stmt was not about whether Saddam had the WMDs, but was about the case against Saddam clearly puts him in the middle of selling the war to the American people.

If he knew as much as he did about the actually intelligence and had the concerns he said he did, then he shouldn't have been as involved in selling the war. He did what was expected of him, rather enthusiastically.
Seamus
     NY Times on ex-CIA chief George Tenet's book. - (Another Scott) - (15)
         Tenet's been hawking the book on TV. - (a6l6e6x) - (11)
             I understand the sentiment. - (Another Scott) - (10)
                 Re: incapable of going around Rice and Cheney - (a6l6e6x)
                 He is/was a career beaucrat - (Seamus) - (2)
                     He's argument on the slam-dunk - (Simon_Jester) - (1)
                         That's the point - (Seamus)
                 OTOH, reasonable people knew it was bull - (jake123) - (5)
                     Yes, many here had it right. I wasn't one of them. -NT - (Another Scott)
                     Public ownership of what? - (mmoffitt)
                     Just heard him interviewed on NPR - (crazy) - (2)
                         He's going to be on Lehrer's NewsHour on Thursday. - (Another Scott)
                         "Weaselly". -NT - (CRConrad)
         The CIA lost all credibility in 1991. - (mmoffitt)
         Christina Shelton gives her view of a briefing to Tenet. - (Another Scott) - (1)
             Thomas Powers throws a few more logs on that fire - (Ashton)

Pain is merely nature's way of hurting you.
71 ms