better idea

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #283,388 by boxley 4/30/07 12:21:43 PM Reply	better idea if that is not an option allow a crucial monitoring box to go dark, when the inevitable happens explain that the screen saver was in place so no monitoring could be done. thanx, bill Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 51 years. meep reach me at [link\|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net\|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net]
Post #283,389 by Silverlock 4/30/07 12:29:44 PM Reply	Cute. I put together a reghack that takes care of it. It has to be run on each reboot but it works. ----------------------------------------- You can fire an at will employee for good cause or no cause, but not bad cause.
Post #283,390 by boxley 4/30/07 12:35:58 PM Reply	but that circumvents "THEIR" directive better to let them understand their folly. thanx, bill Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 51 years. meep reach me at [link\|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net\|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net]
Post #283,391 by Seamus 4/30/07 12:50:55 PM Reply	It's a crap shoot If they can put into place a policy without having thought through the need for potential exemptions, they probably won't see that it was their folly that caused the problem. Seamus
Post #283,395 by Silverlock 4/30/07 1:13:51 PM Reply	It'll get fixed eventually. This was meant as added security for the CC processing folks and some bright MBA decided to make it a universal policy. I give it 3 months before it's restricted just to the CC processors. ----------------------------------------- You can fire an at will employee for good cause or no cause, but not bad cause.

Auto mouse mover utility? - (Silverlock) - (19) - April 30, 2007, 11:42:00 AM EDT

Seems Ideal for a Trojan. - (Another Scott) - (1) - April 30, 2007, 11:56:32 AM EDT

Trojans; That's what I was thinking - (Silverlock) - April 30, 2007, 12:11:09 PM EDT

Yeah. Ask for an exemption to the rule. -NT - (bepatient) - (7) - April 30, 2007, 11:58:34 AM EDT

Thanks. Why didn't I think of that? - (Silverlock) - (6) - April 30, 2007, 12:12:05 PM EDT

better idea - (boxley) - (4) - April 30, 2007, 12:21:43 PM EDT

Cute. I put together a reghack that takes care of it. - (Silverlock) - (3) - April 30, 2007, 12:29:44 PM EDT

but that circumvents "THEIR" directive - (boxley) - (2) - April 30, 2007, 12:35:58 PM EDT

It's a crap shoot - (Seamus) - April 30, 2007, 12:50:55 PM EDT

It'll get fixed eventually. - (Silverlock) - April 30, 2007, 01:13:51 PM EDT

Then 1) put it in the post - (bepatient) - April 30, 2007, 12:51:52 PM EDT

Not required - (crazy) - (6) - April 30, 2007, 09:29:44 PM EDT

Thanks but alrady fixed. -NT - (Silverlock) - (5) - April 30, 2007, 09:50:33 PM EDT

OK, maybe next time... - (Meerkat) - (4) - May 1, 2007, 05:01:54 AM EDT

:-D -NT - (Another Scott) - May 1, 2007, 07:35:43 AM EDT

May not work - (SpiceWare) - (2) - May 1, 2007, 10:21:24 AM EDT

A VB app...? Did you try just the .REG file? -NT - (CRConrad) - (1) - May 1, 2007, 11:52:18 AM EDT

never heard of that before - (SpiceWare) - May 1, 2007, 03:38:40 PM EDT

Quaint solution: - (folkert) - April 30, 2007, 10:46:11 PM EDT

Doesn't this thread belong somewhere else, then? (new thread) - (CRConrad) - May 1, 2007, 06:12:34 AM EDT

iwethey.org

[C:\]_
83 ms