IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Thanks - nicely legible explanation.
Where my lore fails is:
W.T.F. the concept "modular" - is not applicable to a one-size-fits-all [*nix build.]
Yes, the CPU needs to arrange some memory for running the {missing} modem-engine and
Yes, part of the operations of a chosen DSP may or may not be (also) delegated to the CPU == yan memory allocation for these ancillary calcs.

But.. reinvent those wheels for every kernel change?
So then, W.T.F. does "modular" really *mean* re *nix?

Yeah.. ignorance Kills.


Expand Edited by Ashton April 23, 2007, 06:58:51 AM EDT
New It is an Intellectual Property concern.
If they're willing to compile it for your Linux kernel, they are obviously able to compile it for a range of kernels. But they still want you to get it from them, perhaps even in exchange for money. They just don't want you to hand it out to all at large. That's their right, whether or not they choose to exercise it. IOW, it's not a technical limitation.


Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed
Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary

-- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne.

· my ·
· [link|http://staticsan.livejournal.com/|blog] ·
· [link|http://yceran.org/|website] ·

     Linux-compatible modem question - (cwbrenn) - (33)
         Actually they're not all useless. - (bepatient) - (14)
             Alas... - (cwbrenn) - (13)
                 Did you try... - (Yendor) - (4)
                     cwbrenn do the lspci junk in Yendor's post. -NT - (folkert) - (3)
                         ok -- will try this evening -NT - (cwbrenn) - (2)
                             OK, this makes no sense at all whatsoever. - (cwbrenn) - (1)
                                 Re: OK, this makes no sense at all whatsoever. - (JayMehaffey)
                 Are you sure you're up to this? :-) - (static) - (7)
                     No. No, I'm really not. :) - (cwbrenn)
                     Net thread on this - (bepatient) - (4)
                         Thanks for a hint - - (Ashton) - (3)
                             This is not surprising. - (static) - (2)
                                 Thanks - nicely legible explanation. - (Ashton) - (1)
                                     It is an Intellectual Property concern. - (static)
                     Thou asketh - - - Modems... yeah.. RIGHT, (new thread) - (Ashton)
         I am now less pleased with my laptop... - (cwbrenn) - (17)
             There are ways... - (Another Scott) - (1)
                 Holy crap! - (cwbrenn)
             You can get USB-serial adapters. - (static) - (3)
                 Yep, that worked. - (cwbrenn) - (2)
                     there's a reason radio shack still exists. -NT - (Silverlock)
                     Idiots - that's where I bought the Belkin unit I mentioned -NT - (Steve Lowe)
             Either get a USB to RS-232 adapter or a USB modem - (Steve Lowe) - (1)
                 I've yet to see a USB modem that isn't a winmodem... - (cwbrenn)
             parallel to serial converters have been around forever. -NT - (Silverlock) - (3)
                 Yeah, but the problem is - (cwbrenn) - (2)
                     (side note -- a sign that I am actually learning things...) - (cwbrenn) - (1)
                         We'll make a Linux wonk out of you yet! :-) -NT - (static)
             I have a couple ... - (folkert) - (4)
                 Ominous... - (cwbrenn) - (3)
                     Replied back... - (folkert) - (2)
                         Haven't had a chance to check my mail yet... - (cwbrenn) - (1)
                             Oi! No probs. -NT - (folkert)

I made it through almost 20 minutes of this before coming out of my skin and destroying the TV with my mad shrieking.
92 ms