IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Yes worse than Lincoln
Lincoln is also unique among presidents. Lincoln's civil rights record is bad, but he was in a civil war and made bad decisions under extreme pressure. He held the country together and you can ask at what price. But, Lincoln was in control of his administration facing situations not faced before by earlier presidents.

Bush is not in a civil war and has done material damage to America's standing in the world.

As to Grant, read this [link|http://faculty.css.edu/mkelsey/usgrant/presid.html|http://faculty.css.e...grant/presid.html] and tell someone will be able to write something similar about Bush after his presidency.
Seamus
New Thanks for the link.
     Interesting /. comment - (pwhysall) - (10)
         Democrats have not moved quickly enough - (JayMehaffey) - (2)
             It isn't just the president - (tuberculosis) - (1)
                 NurembErg, not -bUrg. Thank you. - (CRConrad)
         I'll wave to him on his walk up the jetway. -NT - (bepatient)
         Lots of people feel that way. - (Another Scott) - (2)
             While it is hard to judge the best as well the worst - (Seamus) - (1)
                 On ME policy, its even more troubling - (bepatient)
         considering the hyberbole, - (boxley) - (2)
             Yes worse than Lincoln - (Seamus) - (1)
                 Thanks for the link. -NT - (Another Scott)

We don't think of it as a rebellion. We call it "heavily armed stress leave."
40 ms