Yes, the DoJ has an agreement they want ratified. But that doesn't mean that the DoJ lawyers are going to try to shirk their duties. Let's wait and see.
They've already shirked their duties with this lame, limp settlement.
Who thinks that the DoJ will respond to many comments?
- (ben_tilly)
- (11)
- Feb. 11, 2002, 01:24:10 PM EST
I'm more concerned with what CKK will do
-NT
- (tonytib)
- (10)
- Feb. 11, 2002, 07:30:09 PM EST
Ultimately so am I
- (ben_tilly)
- (9)
- Feb. 11, 2002, 07:59:31 PM EST
What accountability would that be?
- (Ashton)
- (6)
- Feb. 12, 2002, 03:53:34 AM EST
You are right, only a blue sky chance at it really happening
- (ben_tilly)
- Feb. 12, 2002, 07:18:30 AM EST
You want your country back?
- (mhuber)
- (4)
- Feb. 13, 2002, 12:21:01 AM EST
I could consort with honest debauchery.
- (Ashton)
- (1)
- Feb. 14, 2002, 04:44:08 PM EST
Language murder?
- (wharris2)
- Feb. 15, 2002, 04:21:01 AM EST
Hey, you're impinging on my campaign!
- (inthane-chan)
- (1)
- Feb. 14, 2002, 10:21:51 PM EST
Well...
- (ben_tilly)
- Feb. 14, 2002, 11:52:26 PM EST
Another possible explanation.
- (Another Scott)
- (1)
- Feb. 12, 2002, 08:18:35 AM EST
What? (DoJ)
- (wharris2)
- Feb. 12, 2002, 02:07:45 PM EST