Or was he interviewed?

Because Goodling's lawyer seems to imply that congress let Marceca invoke the 5th w/o talking to them at all. Which doesn't seem to be the case at all. Why would this be a precedent for her request to not to have to invoke the 5th in person before congress. I hope they address the issue and show exactly how people, if any, have been able to invoke the 5th when ask to testify before Congress without doing it in person.

"In a second report, Ray concludes there is insufficient evidence to prove that Anthony Marceca, who worked at the White House Office of Personnel Security, knowingly made any false statements to Congress with regard to why the files were requested."

[link|http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/07/28/clinton.filegate/index.html|http://archives.cnn....legate/index.html]