IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Hicks gets nine months
[link|http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,21479623-5003402,00.html|News.com.au]
In the first conviction by the controversial Guantanamo military tribunals and the first conviction in a US war crimes trial since World War II, a panel of military officers had recommended a maximum sentence of seven years.

But judge Colonel Ralph Kohlmann revealed that a plea deal for Hicks required that "any portion of a sentence in excess of nine months" be suspended.

In exchange for promising to keep his mouth shut and not bring any charges against the US, he gets a trivial sentence and gets to go home. Which probably explains the sudden change of behavior on his part, from fighting all the way to entering a guilty plea.

I suspect they offered him a sweat deal because the Australian government has been leaning on the US to do something with Hicks. And trying to bring a case against him had major problems because of the weak evidence, plus the risk of evidence of his torture in prison coming up.

So offering him this deal gets him off their hands, and insures a guilty entry in their books. Given the questionable nature of the process and Bush's political position, they are not going to want anything but guilty verdicts. So they will do everything they can to avoid bringing any cases but they ones they know they can win.

Jay
New Seems about right
I have no intention of tracking this down, so feel free to accuse me of making stuff up, but I seem to recall that when sentencing someone often the judge will take into account pretrial detention time, double it, and apply it to the sentence as time already searched.
New Not the case here
The panel of this particular star chamber wanted 7 years of further confinement. They learned at sentencing that a secret deal had been struck. [link|http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/3/31/111922/159|Link]
-----------------------------------------
Draft Clark [link|http://draftwesleyclark.com/|now].
New Expect to hear the whole story in about 2 months...
As a result, Hicks will be transferred to Australia within two months - as stipulated by the plea bargain agreement - and will likely be a free man by the new year after more than five years at the Guantanamo detention camp.


Under the terms of his plea deal, Hicks agreed to withdraw allegations he had been abused at the hands US personnel and is prohibited from speaking to the media for a year about the case.


Once he get's out from under Bush's thumb, the whole story will come out (or lies if you prefer).
New Another piece in the puzzle:
There's a federal election in Australia this year. So, miraculously, he'll be back in Australia in time for that. Of course, I'm sure that's just a co-incidence :)
Two out of three people wonder where the other one is.
New ...despite the pollies saying otherwise.
Who to believe? But then, does it matter? :-)

Wade.


Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed
 
Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary
Please



-- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne.

· my ·
· [link|http://staticsan.livejournal.com/|blog] ·
· [link|http://yceran.org/|website] ·

     Hicks gets nine months - (JayMehaffey) - (5)
         Seems about right - (crazy) - (1)
             Not the case here - (Silverlock)
         Expect to hear the whole story in about 2 months... - (Simon_Jester)
         Another piece in the puzzle: - (Meerkat) - (1)
             ...despite the pollies saying otherwise. - (static)

Na'ghimgor thdid lym.
Myn th'x barsoom lu'gndar.
In'path gix mth'nabor.
In'path nox vel'dekk.
Yig sudeth M'cylorum.
M'xxlit kraddath Soggoth im'betnk.
Nog s'dath blexmed!
42 ms