Well, there they go again - (drewk) - (9) - March 8, 2007, 11:51:26 PM EST
         How is that FUD? - (admin) - (8) - March 9, 2007, 09:52:19 AM EST
             Because it doesn't matter where the code came from - (JayMehaffey) - (7) - March 9, 2007, 11:30:29 AM EST
                 They're not talking about copying closed source - (admin) - (6) - March 9, 2007, 11:44:13 AM EST
                     How is it worse/different from closed source? - (drewk) - (3) - March 9, 2007, 12:22:08 PM EST
                         Because people are far less likely to see closed source. - (crazy) - (2) - March 9, 2007, 01:39:56 PM EST
                             Really? - (ubernostrum) - (1) - March 9, 2007, 11:48:00 PM EST
                                 Purposeful denseness - (crazy) - March 10, 2007, 12:11:49 AM EST
                     It's not false per se - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - March 9, 2007, 01:14:22 PM EST
                         Yes, it's bad product placement - (drewk) - March 9, 2007, 01:29:52 PM EST