IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Removes the need for SET CONSTRAINTS
As far as I can tell. You're right, it's not their best documented feature.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New Initially Deferred seems to be doing the right thing -thx
This is really getting to be nice development environment - I've added schema comparison/migration features to glorp in squeak and now I just change the object model and it syncs it on demand - with warnings for non-empty tables when dropping and options to merge dropped non-empty columns to other columns. Doing the inverse sync from tables to objects should take all of a couple hours giving round tripping in two directions.

Rails, shmails.



[link|http://www.blackbagops.net|Black Bag Operations Log]

[link|http://www.objectiveclips.com|Artificial Intelligence]

[link|http://www.badpage.info/seaside/html|Scrutinizer]
New Re: Initially Deferred seems to be doing the right thing -th
I reckon the SET CONSTRAINTS wasn't working for some reason, then.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
     So does 'DEFERRABLE' not work in postgres? - (tuberculosis) - (5)
         Possibly not a bug: - (admin) - (4)
             The naming convention is a bug in itself - (tuberculosis) - (3)
                 Removes the need for SET CONSTRAINTS - (admin) - (2)
                     Initially Deferred seems to be doing the right thing -thx - (tuberculosis) - (1)
                         Re: Initially Deferred seems to be doing the right thing -th - (admin)

Can bitching and moaning atone?
35 ms