IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Oh, what am I doing?
Excuse: it was late.

Graphical previews of HTML files? On the World Wide Web?

What an utter pillock. Apologies if I disrupted your idiot-fields.

Just click [link|http://homepage.ntlworld.com/peter.whysall1/css_test1.html|here], like a normal person would have told you to do in the first place.


Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
[link|http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?pwhysall|A better terminal emulator]
[image|http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h262/pwhysall/Misc/saveus.png|0|Darwinia||]
New Colour Contrast Analyser doesn't like some of it.
[link|http://juicystudio.com/article/colour-contrast-analyser-firefox-extension.php|Colour Contrast Analyser]. It flags the pale blue on black and dim white on black as being something to avoid. It is a little hard to read.

Just something to think about.

Cheers,
Scott.
New I was struggling with the anchor colour.
Suggestions welcome - it seems difficult to select a colour that still looks hyperlinky but isn't #0000FF


Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
[link|http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?pwhysall|A better terminal emulator]
[image|http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h262/pwhysall/Misc/saveus.png|0|Darwinia||]
New Maybe just keep the achors white, with underlines.
The [link|http://www.w3.org/TR/AERT#color|AERT] discussion at W3C seems to use the same color for anchors as for headings, but with underlining of the links. Also, when you mouse-over the links, the background color changes (similar things happen at LinuxToday).

I'd suggest just sticking with white text (or some other high-contrast color) and doing things like the AERT document does.

HTH.

Cheers,
Scott.
New I played around with Vischeck some.
[link|http://vischeck.homeip.net/uploads/11675819754039/|This] combination of colors seems easier to read to me. It's the Tritanope simulation of your example.

HTH.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Another dark theme to consider is Bloomberg's
E.g. [link|http://www.bloomberg.com/news/worldwide/|World News].

The contrast is pretty good, but I still think I like their previous style (that didn't have a black background) better. A problem with this style is clicking on a link gives a news story with black text on a white background. If it's good enough for that, why not for the main page?

HTH a bit.

Cheers,
Scott.
(Who still thinks a black background is generally too reminiscent of the 1995 Web.)
New I like it. Much!
Two out of three people wonder where the other one is.
     OK, here's my first stab at it. (96K img) - (pwhysall) - (23)
         Kinda cool -NT - (drewk)
         Oh, what am I doing? - (pwhysall) - (6)
             Colour Contrast Analyser doesn't like some of it. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                 I was struggling with the anchor colour. - (pwhysall) - (3)
                     Maybe just keep the achors white, with underlines. - (Another Scott)
                     I played around with Vischeck some. - (Another Scott)
                     Another dark theme to consider is Bloomberg's - (Another Scott)
             I like it. Much! -NT - (Meerkat)
         Question -- will this be an optional change? - (Nightowl) - (13)
             Don't worry... - (imric) - (1)
                 excellent answer! :D -NT - (Steve Lowe)
             Please read what's written. - (pwhysall) - (2)
                 I did read it, Peter - (Nightowl) - (1)
                     Re: I did read it, Peter - (pwhysall)
             it looks like crap to me too -NT - (boxley) - (3)
                 STFU if nothing constructive to say, cheers. -NT - (pwhysall) - (2)
                     You asked for opinions... - (jb4) - (1)
                         "it looks like crap" is "constructive"? - (pwhysall)
             'hard on eyes' ??? - (Ashton) - (3)
                 For me, yes - (Nightowl) - (2)
                     Re: For me, yes - (pwhysall) - (1)
                         Forgot to add - (Nightowl)
         Here's how we could implement it. - (pwhysall)

This movie doesn't scrape the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't below the bottom of the barrel. This movie doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence with barrels.
68 ms