IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Patent Wars and Antitrust Forum
/
Did ZD do a followup, hmmm?
Post #276,289
by
Another Scott
12/21/06 10:32:06 AM
Reply
Did ZD do a followup, hmmm?
French consumer group targets the Microsoft tax.
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- (80)
- Dec. 14, 2006, 11:46:50 AM EST
French consumer group targets the "Microsoft tax".
- (
andread
)
- (79)
- Dec. 14, 2006, 03:58:48 PM EST
Maybe you can
- (
tuberculosis
)
- Dec. 14, 2006, 07:30:30 PM EST
thats probably the most stupid remark you have ever uttered
- (
boxley
)
- (77)
- Dec. 14, 2006, 07:51:38 PM EST
Unfortunately, no, it isn't.
- (
CRConrad
)
- (76)
- Dec. 15, 2006, 02:40:10 AM EST
So Move to France
- (
andread
)
- (75)
- Dec. 15, 2006, 10:57:20 AM EST
so only white box builders should be allowed to not sell $MS
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (74)
- Dec. 15, 2006, 11:40:09 AM EST
Re: so only white box builders should be allowed to not sell
- (
andread
)
- (73)
- Dec. 15, 2006, 03:36:12 PM EST
really?
- (
boxley
)
- Dec. 15, 2006, 03:48:56 PM EST
It most certainly is a question of allowed.
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (71)
- Dec. 15, 2006, 03:51:06 PM EST
Re: It most certainly is a question of allowed.
- (
andread
)
- (70)
- Dec. 17, 2006, 11:20:32 AM EST
well dell and gateway anyway, customer service sux
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- Dec. 17, 2006, 11:32:50 AM EST
Hmm.
- (
Another Scott
)
- Dec. 17, 2006, 11:35:45 AM EST
It is to laugh . . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (3)
- Dec. 17, 2006, 12:20:10 PM EST
Nit
- (
pwhysall
)
- (1)
- Dec. 17, 2006, 12:16:24 PM EST
Yea, PowerEdge - corrected.
-NT
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- Dec. 17, 2006, 12:18:43 PM EST
I have a Lenovo laptop
- (
crazy
)
- Dec. 17, 2006, 12:16:27 PM EST
You miss the point spectacularly.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (63)
- Dec. 17, 2006, 12:15:10 PM EST
Most shills do. ;-)
-NT
- (
n3jja
)
- (61)
- Dec. 17, 2006, 06:16:10 PM EST
Re: Most shills do. ;-)
- (
andread
)
- (60)
- Dec. 18, 2006, 10:19:59 AM EST
There are certainly ways to do that WITHOUT
- (
bepatient
)
- Dec. 18, 2006, 10:36:40 AM EST
All PC buyers aren't the same.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (8)
- Dec. 18, 2006, 10:49:56 AM EST
Why on Earth would you think such a thing???
- (
CRConrad
)
- (7)
- Dec. 18, 2006, 04:14:10 PM EST
Fanboy, maybe. Shill, no.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (6)
- Dec. 18, 2006, 04:31:31 PM EST
Perhaps even a longterm MSFT stockholder.
-NT
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- Dec. 18, 2006, 05:35:45 PM EST
Whew! For a while there, I thought I had the usage wrong...
- (
CRConrad
)
- (4)
- Dec. 19, 2006, 11:55:20 AM EST
dunno crc shill/fanboy=prostitute/slut one gets paid to
- (
boxley
)
- Dec. 19, 2006, 12:15:49 PM EST
wrong
- (
andread
)
- (2)
- Dec. 21, 2006, 09:47:33 AM EST
Uuuh... How, exactly, was that *not* logic?
- (
CRConrad
)
- (1)
- Dec. 21, 2006, 02:34:06 PM EST
logic?
- (
andread
)
- Dec. 22, 2006, 12:25:44 AM EST
I addressed your point directly, you ignored it, again
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- Dec. 18, 2006, 11:46:10 AM EST
It's a lot harder, actually.
- (
pwhysall
)
- Dec. 18, 2006, 12:30:18 PM EST
I addressed your point directly, you ignored it, again
- (
boxley
)
- Dec. 18, 2006, 11:46:13 AM EST
And that means "Windows only" just how?
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (46)
- Dec. 18, 2006, 12:29:27 PM EST
Re: And that means "Windows only" just how?
- (
andread
)
- (45)
- Dec. 18, 2006, 05:07:48 PM EST
I'll bet companies that have to pay twice would like it.
- (
Another Scott
)
- Dec. 18, 2006, 05:30:08 PM EST
The value of PCs without software?
- (
pwhysall
)
- (43)
- Dec. 18, 2006, 05:50:48 PM EST
Re: The value of PCs without software?
- (
andread
)
- (42)
- Dec. 19, 2006, 10:50:53 AM EST
You are still missing it
- (
bepatient
)
- (18)
- Dec. 19, 2006, 11:04:08 AM EST
For values of "missing it" equal to "doesn't WANT to get it"
- (
CRConrad
)
- (14)
- Dec. 19, 2006, 12:01:22 PM EST
I understand the mental block
- (
bepatient
)
- (11)
- Dec. 19, 2006, 12:17:14 PM EST
Bunk
- (
andread
)
- (10)
- Dec. 19, 2006, 04:09:42 PM EST
Bullpucky
- (
bepatient
)
- Dec. 19, 2006, 05:53:03 PM EST
horsekabobs
- (
boxley
)
- (8)
- Dec. 19, 2006, 05:59:16 PM EST
Are you talking desktops or servers?
- (
lincoln
)
- (7)
- Dec. 20, 2006, 02:46:56 PM EST
Dell's schizophrenic regarding Linux.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (6)
- Dec. 20, 2006, 03:05:24 PM EST
Last I heard - though that was a while back . . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (5)
- Dec. 20, 2006, 05:38:47 PM EST
well, hear this
- (
andread
)
- (4)
- Dec. 21, 2006, 09:44:01 AM EST
Please note: S-E-R-V-E-R
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (3)
- Dec. 21, 2006, 09:48:27 AM EST
your words cited below
- (
andread
)
- (1)
- Dec. 21, 2006, 09:54:30 AM EST
That's not what was said.
- (
pwhysall
)
- Dec. 21, 2006, 10:27:16 AM EST
I can show you a desktop...
- (
pwhysall
)
- Dec. 21, 2006, 10:48:18 AM EST
For values of "Chuckles" equal to "doesn't get it"
- (
andread
)
- (1)
- Dec. 19, 2006, 04:13:48 PM EST
Chuckling my cheeks off.
- (
CRConrad
)
- Dec. 20, 2006, 03:44:30 AM EST
Re: You are still missing it
- (
andread
)
- (2)
- Dec. 19, 2006, 04:02:00 PM EST
I didn't give you a car analogy
- (
bepatient
)
- (1)
- Dec. 19, 2006, 05:59:53 PM EST
I think he's just trying to be annoying
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- Dec. 20, 2006, 01:35:22 AM EST
Re: The value of PCs without software?
- (
pwhysall
)
- (18)
- Dec. 19, 2006, 11:26:46 AM EST
full retail?
- (
andread
)
- (1)
- Dec. 19, 2006, 04:03:50 PM EST
Re: Business model
- (
hnick
)
- Dec. 19, 2006, 04:41:26 PM EST
Re: The value of PCs without software?
- (
Simon_Jester
)
- (15)
- Dec. 20, 2006, 09:48:41 AM EST
Re: The value of PCs without software?
- (
pwhysall
)
- (14)
- Dec. 20, 2006, 10:10:24 AM EST
Wow....
- (
Simon_Jester
)
- (13)
- Dec. 20, 2006, 11:44:26 AM EST
The refund is wrong.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (12)
- Dec. 20, 2006, 11:47:07 AM EST
a little googling
- (
andread
)
- (11)
- Dec. 21, 2006, 10:02:37 AM EST
Did ZD do a followup, hmmm?
-NT
- (
Another Scott
)
- Dec. 21, 2006, 10:32:06 AM EST
No pressure...of course not.
- (
Simon_Jester
)
- Dec. 21, 2006, 02:20:52 PM EST
As a builder formerly listed as a "Microsoft Partner" -
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- Dec. 21, 2006, 02:38:18 PM EST
Re: a little googling ____ Not. So. Fast. there, fanboy
- (
Ashton
)
- (7)
- Dec. 22, 2006, 03:19:41 AM EST
Ashton . . . you trying to overload the poor boy?
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- Dec. 22, 2006, 12:48:15 PM EST
Re: a little googling
- (
andread
)
- (5)
- Dec. 22, 2006, 09:09:45 PM EST
Ooh boy
- (
bepatient
)
- (4)
- Dec. 22, 2006, 09:55:32 PM EST
Ooh
- (
andread
)
- (3)
- Dec. 23, 2006, 10:28:47 AM EST
I know you're missing this on purpose, but ...
- (
drewk
)
- Dec. 23, 2006, 01:02:46 PM EST
You STILL ignore the point
- (
bepatient
)
- Dec. 23, 2006, 01:21:51 PM EST
Oh...So what, exactly, *did* you think we'd be discussing...
- (
CRConrad
)
- Dec. 23, 2006, 03:22:57 PM EST
Car analogy holds
- (
jbrabeck
)
- (3)
- Dec. 19, 2006, 02:23:48 PM EST
Car analogy reeks
- (
andread
)
- (2)
- Dec. 19, 2006, 04:15:45 PM EST
Car analogy works
- (
ubernostrum
)
- Dec. 19, 2006, 04:58:52 PM EST
Eh?
- (
pwhysall
)
- Dec. 20, 2006, 02:18:01 AM EST
That's not what he was aiming for
-NT
- (
drewk
)
- Dec. 17, 2006, 06:20:48 PM EST
i
we
they
.org
Boy, isn't that true about damn near any subject?
127 ms