IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Eh? I did it in 3 lines.
Anyhow, I find it easier to modify data structures than to fiddle text- which is error prone. When the text represents a data structure, like source code or xml, modifying the parse tree is more reliable and, I think, easier.

Anyhow, you're taking me way too seriously. :-)



[link|http://www.blackbagops.net|Black Bag Operations Log]

[link|http://www.objectiveclips.com|Artificial Intelligence]

[link|http://www.badpage.info/seaside/html|Scrutinizer]
Expand Edited by tuberculosis Dec. 12, 2006, 09:15:23 PM EST
New Re: Eh? I did it in 3 lines.
If I were going to do it more than once, sure. Otherwise it's a waste of time. Writing a keyboard macro is simple and quick, much quicker than even your 3 lines of code.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
     Help! How to programatically edit case of strings? - (CRConrad) - (24)
         Problem restated - (crazy) - (3)
             Particular - SOME tag, not any other tag. - (CRConrad) - (2)
                 The ultimate clueless non-programmer wannabe approach - (crazy) - (1)
                     Thanks a lot... (new thread) - (CRConrad)
         Well, in Squeak it would look something like - (tuberculosis)
         UltraEdit will do it. - (Another Scott)
         at risk of a war, do this - (boxley) - (16)
             alt-C, bay-bee. - (admin)
             Go ahead - (crazy) - (14)
                 get vi'ed :-) I dont use that shite -NT - (boxley)
                 Who the fsck writes LISP to use Emacs? -NT - (admin) - (12)
                     Ok, fine. - (crazy) - (11)
                         I need more of the problem specifics - (admin) - (9)
                             Hope it's a single file - (crazy) - (8)
                                 As always, use the right tool for the job. - (admin) - (7)
                                     Bunch of text mungers - (tuberculosis) - (6)
                                         Er, come again? - (admin) - (4)
                                             thats our todd, no point manipulating some text - (boxley) - (1)
                                                 Probably smaller than emacs, though :-P -NT - (admin)
                                             Eh? I did it in 3 lines. - (tuberculosis) - (1)
                                                 Re: Eh? I did it in 3 lines. - (admin)
                                         emacs is xml? -NT - (boxley)
                         Re: Ok, fine. - (admin)
         Thanks, Scotts. - (CRConrad)

Batches? BATCHES?? We don't need no steenkin' batches!
94 ms