IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 3 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Linux Forum / Re: Nothing retroactive about it
Post #274,234
by andread
11/28/06 3:13:57 PM
Reply
New Re: Nothing retroactive about it
so if I'm a free-software developer, I can't choose the license for my work?
Play I Some Music w/ Papa Andy
Saturday 8 PM - 11 PM ET
All Night Rewind 11 PM - 5 PM
Reggae, African and Caribbean Music
[link|http://wxxe.org|Tune In]
Post #274,235
by crazy
11/28/06 3:16:01 PM
Reply
New Define your goal and possible usage
Post #274,238
by CRConrad
11/28/06 3:38:39 PM
Reply
New Sure you can. For *your* work, *you* can...
...but for the *FSF's* work, *Novell* doesn't get to choose the license.

That's only fair, isn't it?


   [link|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode|Christian R. Conrad]
(I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.)
Ah, the Germans: Masters of Convoluted Simplification. — [link|http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=1603|Jehovah]
     Change GPL retroactively? - (andread) - (19) - Nov. 28, 2006, 02:11:47 PM EST
         Nothing retroactive about it - (crazy) - (3) - Nov. 28, 2006, 02:40:27 PM EST
             Re: Nothing retroactive about it - (andread) - (2) - Nov. 28, 2006, 03:13:57 PM EST
                 Define your goal and possible usage -NT - (crazy) - Nov. 28, 2006, 03:16:01 PM EST
                 Sure you can. For *your* work, *you* can... - (CRConrad) - Nov. 28, 2006, 03:38:39 PM EST
         Nope. - (folkert) - (13) - Nov. 28, 2006, 04:06:01 PM EST
             Nope to you - (crazy) - (12) - Nov. 28, 2006, 04:17:16 PM EST
                 I disagree. - (folkert) - (11) - Nov. 28, 2006, 05:46:17 PM EST
                     Yes and no - (crazy) - (10) - Nov. 28, 2006, 07:37:41 PM EST
                         You think Linus will accept patches under anything but 2.0? -NT - (CRConrad) - (1) - Nov. 29, 2006, 03:09:55 AM EST
                             Dunno - (crazy) - Nov. 29, 2006, 06:57:32 AM EST
                         There is no way that the Linux KERNEL will ever be... - (folkert) - (7) - Nov. 29, 2006, 04:13:17 AM EST
                             But the issue is not just the kernel - (crazy) - Nov. 29, 2006, 07:00:18 AM EST
                             Why would anyone fork GCC, etc? Who? - (CRConrad) - (5) - Nov. 29, 2006, 07:29:49 AM EST
                                 egcs -NT - (altmann) - (4) - Nov. 29, 2006, 01:00:20 PM EST
                                     That was neither Novell nor Linus rabid 2.0 gang, was it? -NT - (CRConrad) - (3) - Nov. 29, 2006, 03:25:39 PM EST
                                         Didn't that get un-forked, too? -NT - (pwhysall) - (2) - Nov. 29, 2006, 04:09:00 PM EST
                                             Yup - but not over license issues - (crazy) - (1) - Nov. 29, 2006, 04:43:22 PM EST
                                                 Why - is Amazon in the business of *distributing gcc*? - (CRConrad) - Nov. 30, 2006, 06:29:13 AM EST
         Thanks Gentlemen - (andread) - Nov. 29, 2006, 09:25:18 AM EST

Armed with WoMS*.


*(Weapons of Mass *SHUN*)
66 ms