IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Are the Masters of the Universe* finally getting in trouble?
[link|http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aZ1AOz3ziTXY&refer=worldwide|Bloomberg]:

Nov. 10 (Bloomberg) -- Hertz Global Holdings Inc. share sale may raise less money than the company planned because potential buyers are balking at further enriching the current ownership group after it paid itself a $1 billion dividend.

Clayton Dubilier & Rice Inc., the Carlyle Group and Merrill Lynch & Co. plan to sell as much as $1.83 billion of shares in the world's largest rental car company Nov. 15. Proceeds will go toward paying off the loan that funded the dividend and for a second disbursement of $426.8 million.

The underwriters may have to reduce the amount of stock offered, lower the per-share price or delay the sale, said John Fitzgibbon, founder of ipoScoop.com in Jersey City, New Jersey.

``It's a really tough sale,'' he said in an interview today. His company tracks initial public offerings.

Hertz spokeswoman Paula Rivera declined to comment. Goldman Sachs Group Inc.'s Michael DuVally, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.'s Torie von Alt and Merrill spokeswoman Terez Hanhan declined to comment. The firms are underwriting the sale. Merrill is a passive minority investor in Bloomberg LP, the parent company of Bloomberg News.

[...]

``These buyers are helping themselves to a pound of flesh from a company with decent cash flow before moving on,'' said Ben Holmes, publisher of Morningnotes.com in Boulder, Colorado. ``Hertz was profitable before the buyout. This year they will lose money.''

[...]

In the IPO prospectus, the owners said their interests may conflict with those of new shareholders. ``The owners seem to be paying themselves, and the market is aware of it,'' said Salvatore Morreale, a trader who watches IPOs at Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. in Los Angeles.

Share sales such as Hertz that enrich private equity firms have historically sold without much problem, said David Menlow, president of ipofinancial.com in Millburn, New Jersey. Investors have been ``forgiving,'' buying the stock knowing that the private firms were being enriched at the expense of the company.

`Doesn't Mean You Should'

``At Hertz, a lot of lines have been crossed,'' he said. ``There's been nothing illegal, but just because you can do something doesn't mean you should.''

[...]


It's good to see that buyouts/sell-backs like these are finally being scrutinized. Too often, it's only the bankers that come out ahead in these things.

* is reference to [link|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bonfire_of_the_Vanities|Tom Wolfe's book].

Cheers,
Scott.
New What?
Proceeds will go toward paying off the loan that funded the dividend
I thought that a dividend was paid when the company made a profit and had the funds to pay the dividend, not where the company had to borrow money. Am I missing something here?
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort. (Herm Albright)
New Wow, cool plan
Carlyle group et al buy a company, take out a huge loan against it, pay themselves a huge dividend, then use the procedes from an IPO to pay off the loan. Guess they couldn't just wait for the IPO to get paid like everyone else does. In a perfect market, the share price realized in the IPO would be discounted by an amount that compensates for the additional debt burden, and this could theoretically be a net neutral transaction. Except that money today is always worth more than money tomorrow.
===

Kip Hawley is still an idiot.

===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
New It's called "Vulture Capitalism".
[link|http://www.bartleby.com/66/43/27743.html|We don't pay taxes. Only the little people pay taxes.]

You don't really expect boards and owners to only make their fair share when there's a profit, do you? WDYH Masters of the Universe SM?

;-)

A nice screed, from 2002, against these types of actions by some CEOs and corporate boards is at [link|http://www.responsiblewealth.org/press/rwnews/2002/enron_KC_star.html|Responsible Wealth].

Cheers,
Scott.
(Who notices that Halliburton was one of the "winners" in the story - which was written before the war started.)
     Are the Masters of the Universe* finally getting in trouble? - (Another Scott) - (3)
         What? - (jbrabeck) - (2)
             Wow, cool plan - (drewk)
             It's called "Vulture Capitalism". - (Another Scott)

Only technical details are missing.
73 ms