nor attacking Islam as a religion but pointing out what some practisioners assert of the religion.

Let me go thru my points one by one.

"4 men need to testify to a rape or its consensual sex and off with her head"
Priya named her attacker but had no proof of rape other than the medical examination. According to Zina laws, her own testimony is not admissible as evidence. Rape must be proved either by the perpetrator's confession or by the testimony of four men.

source [link|http://web.amnesty.org/wire/July2004/Pakistan|http://web.amnesty.o...July2004/Pakistan]
this law is a man made law by men who interpret the koran in this fashion


>>4 wives for one man, 1 pregnant, one housekeeper, one employed so the man doesnt have to work and a sex toy.
I was not being rude, I was being envious that the above could be achieved elswhere, I am actually very aware of the rules and requirements of the koran for more than one wife and the above isnt why.

I am not aware of the laws concerning divorce in egypt, but in Pakistan a woman will usually be killed before a divorce is allowed to happen, this is not religion but fact that has to do with the nature of Pashtun's whose religion is Islam.

Systems, please feel free to correct me at any time, I value your input.
thanx,
bill