IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Open Forum / Jerks at work
Post #27,074
by nking
Picture of nking
2/3/02 11:27:21 AM
Reply
New Jerks at work
or rather in that case a Jerkette. They make life hard for us honest folk, and then always kissup to the higher ups so they don't lose their jobs. When we complain about them, management turns a deaf ear.

We had plenty of them at the lawfirm. Many people rolled their eyes when at a group meeting the boss talked about what a good job these Jerk Managers have been doing. Apparently they never heard the complaints or chose to ignore the complaints about them.
"Will code Visual BASIC for cash."
Post #27,084
by ben_tilly
2/3/02 2:26:22 PM
Reply
New Read the story again
Jerk is the correct gender.

Cheers,
Ben
Post #27,107
by nking
Picture of nking
2/3/02 7:47:41 PM
Reply
New Yes, but
he was acting like another gender, sort of like calling a man in drag a drag queen. Oh well, call him a jerk or jerkette, its all the same.
"Will code Visual BASIC for cash."
Post #27,110
by Meerkat
2/3/02 8:24:59 PM
Reply
New A technicality
Umm I don't think getting a hard-on and pelvic-thrusting are quite 'other gender' behaviours for a man...

Regardless, still very much the Wrong Thing To Do at work of course.
On and on and on and on,
and on and on and on goes John.
     Man-hating Women - (nking) - (16) - Jan. 31, 2002, 06:23:29 PM EST
         Stereotype - (broomberg) - (2) - Jan. 31, 2002, 07:25:21 PM EST
             Not all are like that - (nking) - Jan. 31, 2002, 07:35:44 PM EST
             Stereotype, maybe - (wharris2) - Feb. 1, 2002, 09:09:45 AM EST
         Re: Man-hating Women - (bconnors) - Jan. 31, 2002, 10:22:03 PM EST
         Women-hating Men - (ben_tilly) - (9) - Feb. 1, 2002, 04:51:28 AM EST
             My buddies girlfriends female boss started buying her roses - (boxley) - Feb. 1, 2002, 10:01:56 AM EST
             but it's the pelvic thruuuuussssttttt - (broomberg) - (7) - Feb. 1, 2002, 07:08:21 PM EST
                 so, what are you saying? - (cforde) - (6) - Feb. 2, 2002, 01:23:46 AM EST
                     Let's do the time warp again. - (nking) - (5) - Feb. 2, 2002, 11:06:12 AM EST
                         Could be, or perhaps they were all on drugs - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Feb. 2, 2002, 11:21:10 AM EST
                             Jerks at work - (nking) - (3) - Feb. 3, 2002, 11:27:21 AM EST
                                 Read the story again - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Feb. 3, 2002, 02:26:22 PM EST
                                     Yes, but - (nking) - (1) - Feb. 3, 2002, 07:47:41 PM EST
                                         A technicality - (Meerkat) - Feb. 3, 2002, 08:24:59 PM EST
         It's not about gender, it's about blame shifting. - (marlowe) - (1) - Feb. 1, 2002, 11:09:38 AM EST
             Doesn't matter - (nking) - Feb. 1, 2002, 11:46:26 AM EST

Goose-bumps for any who Know.
66 ms