You're confused, again.

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #27,017 by Brandioch 2/2/02 6:15:20 PM Reply	You're confused, again. You're applying a marlowe "definition" -to- an analysis of a different situation by Scott Now, if you had applied marlowe's "definition" -to- an analysis of a different sittuation BY MARLOWE -then- you would have been correct. Otherwise, you must FIRST ascertain whether Scott endorses Marlowe's "definition". -then- You can point out where they cross. And I have to point this out to an adult.....because?
Post #27,086 by bepatient 2/3/02 2:57:37 PM Reply	no, i'm not now you seem to have the 2 post prior problem. I responded to Marlowes "right to life" definition. Scott gave a rather eloquent dissertation on the case in Texas I referenced in my earlier post. I then clarified...becuase using the texas example was questionable due to the womans sanity. I clarified my earlier post to Marlowe. Keep up You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #27,094 by Brandioch 2/3/02 4:25:11 PM Reply	Hmmm, my monitor must be broken, then. You see, in my display, your post seems to be in reply to Scott's. But you say you're replying to Marlowe? You say that you're clarifying your post to Marlowe? By replying to Scott's post? But Scott's post was in reply to your post that was in reply to Marlowe's post. Brandioch Marlowe Tony Marlowe Bill Scott Bill (But according to the prior definition...) Brandioch Bill Brandioch (this post) Ummmm, no. You were applying Marlowe's definition to Scott's post. Especially when your "post" consisted of: "...none of those kids would survive on a desert island alone..." -and- "so, to extend, she did nothing wrong at all...just her choice." Now, your "desert island" phrasing seems to be a paraphrase of Marlowe's: "If you can survive on a desert island without any help from other human beings, then you have a right to life." Which just leaves: "so, to extend, she did nothing wrong at all...just her choice." As your "clarification" of your original post. And you think that I'm the one that is confused?
Post #27,096 by bepatient 2/3/02 4:49:18 PM Reply	yep i think your the confused one. I bet Scott understood. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]

Fetus reclassified as \ufffdunborn child\ufffd - (Brandioch) - (44) - Jan. 31, 2002, 03:49:45 PM EST

interesting you have to be a US citizen to be eligble - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 31, 2002, 03:55:41 PM EST

Not all the time - (nking) - Jan. 31, 2002, 06:29:24 PM EST

Rowe vs. Wade - (nking) - (4) - Jan. 31, 2002, 06:27:15 PM EST

Drinking alcohol during pregnancy? - (Brandioch) - (1) - Jan. 31, 2002, 06:39:54 PM EST

Some women do it anyway - (nking) - Jan. 31, 2002, 06:49:42 PM EST

I believe 'retrospective abortion' is the term :) - (Meerkat) - Jan. 31, 2002, 10:33:39 PM EST

It is ROE versus Wade - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 1, 2002, 12:13:03 PM EST

Birth of 'The United Sanctified States' imminent? - (Ashton) - Feb. 1, 2002, 01:10:11 AM EST

Wheat and corn reclassifed as "pre-digested crap" - (Silverlock) - (7) - Feb. 1, 2002, 08:33:56 AM EST

Baby==crap? Assholes? My, my. Such black thoughts. - (marlowe) - (6) - Feb. 1, 2002, 01:31:25 PM EST

That acerbic wit just slays me. - (Silverlock) - (5) - Feb. 1, 2002, 02:31:16 PM EST

A simple "you win again" would have sufficed. -NT - (marlowe) - (4) - Feb. 2, 2002, 09:52:43 AM EST

Well then, why didn't you say so before? Thanks! -NT - (Silverlock) - (3) - Feb. 4, 2002, 08:42:43 AM EST

You ruminated for two days, and came up with this? -NT - (marlowe) - (2) - Feb. 4, 2002, 10:25:01 AM EST

Nah, couple seconds. I stay away from here on weekends. -NT - (Silverlock) - (1) - Feb. 4, 2002, 10:30:04 AM EST

Okay, fair enough. But couldn't you have tried harder? - (marlowe) - Feb. 4, 2002, 01:04:16 PM EST

As opposed to a born child? - (marlowe) - (27) - Feb. 1, 2002, 01:19:14 PM EST

Yes. I was. - (Brandioch) - (26) - Feb. 1, 2002, 06:45:37 PM EST

OK, so why can't we abort you? - (tonytib) - (25) - Feb. 1, 2002, 09:36:48 PM EST

*Masturbation Murderers*___or:___ Logic is such sterile fun. - (Ashton) - Feb. 2, 2002, 12:18:00 AM EST

Is he an independently viable life form? - (marlowe) - (9) - Feb. 2, 2002, 09:51:18 AM EST

Wow... - (bepatient) - (7) - Feb. 2, 2002, 09:55:34 AM EST

Should Andrea Yates get the death penalty? I don't think so. - (Another Scott) - (6) - Feb. 2, 2002, 11:27:21 AM EST

But according to the prior definition... - (bepatient) - (5) - Feb. 2, 2002, 12:43:36 PM EST

Sheesh BeeP. - (Ashton) - Feb. 2, 2002, 04:38:36 PM EST

You're confused, again. - (Brandioch) - (3) - Feb. 2, 2002, 06:15:20 PM EST

no, i'm not - (bepatient) - (2) - Feb. 3, 2002, 02:57:37 PM EST

Hmmm, my monitor must be broken, then. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 3, 2002, 04:25:11 PM EST

yep i think your the confused one. - (bepatient) - Feb. 3, 2002, 04:49:18 PM EST

thanks...you got my point -NT - (tonytib) - Feb. 2, 2002, 03:55:28 PM EST

lingwage ez eeeeeezeeeeee. - (Brandioch) - (13) - Feb. 2, 2002, 06:08:47 PM EST

Yeah, it's so easy.....you can't even get it right! - (tonytib) - (5) - Feb. 3, 2002, 12:58:24 PM EST

Sure, just re-classify me. - (Brandioch) - (4) - Feb. 3, 2002, 04:14:50 PM EST

But you're NOT viable on your own -NT - (tonytib) - (3) - Feb. 3, 2002, 09:06:09 PM EST

WTF are you gibbering about, Tone??? -NT - (CRConrad) - (1) - Feb. 4, 2002, 01:53:43 AM EST

LRPD: "Smoke the pipe, and there will be no lies between us" -NT - (Ashton) - Feb. 4, 2002, 01:59:06 AM EST

Is this going to be another "definition"? - (Brandioch) - Feb. 4, 2002, 11:09:28 AM EST

If I abort you - (boxley) - Feb. 3, 2002, 01:34:34 PM EST

Anyone want to answer this? - (Brandioch) - (5) - Feb. 3, 2002, 04:37:43 PM EST

you are discussing the legality - (boxley) - (4) - Feb. 4, 2002, 10:58:28 AM EST

Either way. - (Brandioch) - (3) - Feb. 4, 2002, 11:07:53 AM EST

eh, scraping with knives works both ways? - (boxley) - (2) - Feb. 4, 2002, 11:26:29 AM EST

*sigh* - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 4, 2002, 03:21:14 PM EST

point==taken -NT - (boxley) - Feb. 5, 2002, 10:50:30 AM EST

Powered by blind unix!
59 ms