Within your digital Left/Right world

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #27,003

by Ashton

2/2/02 4:28:49 PM

Within your digital Left/Right world

no light can penetrate - only infrared. Only counter to a Slogan is: another Slogan. Annihilation.

And you still think that sprinkling the word reality around - makes this fuzzy world 'real'?

WTF is this 'Left' - are 'they' like The Murican Peepul, sorta?

WTF is 'being in the right'? - same as 'being in the Right' or just - winning (whatever that means)?

Nothing there to engage. Transmission in neutral.

Drop a Slogan / Go to Jail

Post #27,216

by marlowe

2/4/02 1:00:10 PM

I can see your underwear.

My infrared sensors detect your Maidenform bra. And the fact that you stuff.

Whine as much as you like about my binary technology. It works. Sorry you must grope your way through such a blurry world, but you could buy glasses or something. That is, if you're willing to use such rapacious arrogant Western technology. Reality is messy, but blurry vision only makes it harder to deal with.

Better to adjust the focus than to curse the blurriness. But better to curse the blurriness than to cast aspersions on those of us who can see better.

Got a problem with binary? You won't go far in a high tech world with that attitude. There's only so many jobs for engineers who'll only work with analog circuitry, and fewer still for those who also get all defensive about reality and other negative feedback loops. And rightly so. Digital just works better, and binary is the foundation of digital. Yes, those old vacuum tubes and vinyl records have a "warm" sound, but it's just low order distortion.

[link|http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe/index.html|http://www.angelfir...e/index.html]
Sometimes "tolerance" is just a word for not dealing with things.

Some on left see something wrong with *hard* leftists. - (Silverlock) - (59) - Feb. 1, 2002, 04:12:17 PM EST

A very good read. Thanks for the link. -NT - (Another Scott) - Feb. 1, 2002, 04:27:37 PM EST

Straw Man Anyone? - (andread) - (35) - Feb. 1, 2002, 04:48:09 PM EST

Ermmm.. Uhh, It's an *opinion* piece. - (Silverlock) - (34) - Feb. 1, 2002, 04:51:59 PM EST

I'll be the example. - (Brandioch) - (33) - Feb. 1, 2002, 07:52:11 PM EST

"So Noam is an idiot" - I think that was his point. :-) - (Another Scott) - (3) - Feb. 2, 2002, 12:03:53 AM EST

re "near term" - (Ashton) - Feb. 2, 2002, 02:44:23 AM EST

Simple, we don't. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 2, 2002, 06:01:49 PM EST

Hey Khas, there IS an (ultra-easy-to-use!) Quote select box! -NT - (CRConrad) - Feb. 3, 2002, 03:19:29 PM EST

Whew! A maelstrom of mixed metaphors + micturations. - (Ashton) - Feb. 2, 2002, 02:20:46 AM EST

Oh, my. - (Ric Locke) - (27) - Feb. 2, 2002, 12:23:43 PM EST

OK.. the species isn't ready for sweet Reasonableness - (Ashton) - Feb. 2, 2002, 04:20:29 PM EST

I didn't know we were responsible for everyone. - (Brandioch) - (25) - Feb. 2, 2002, 05:42:36 PM EST

Oh, dear. - (Ric Locke) - (24) - Feb. 4, 2002, 09:07:54 PM EST

I didn't know we were responsible for everyone. (again) - (Brandioch) - (23) - Feb. 5, 2002, 12:18:01 AM EST

Re: I didn't know we were responsible for everyone. (again) - (wharris2) - (1) - Feb. 5, 2002, 01:15:48 AM EST

Which leads to my other point. - (Brandioch) - Feb. 5, 2002, 11:43:53 AM EST

Brandi, USE the freaking QUOTE BUTTON! That's what it's FOR! -NT - (CRConrad) - (7) - Feb. 5, 2002, 11:54:28 AM EST

Hey, cut him some slack. I've never noticed it either. - (Another Scott) - (6) - Feb. 5, 2002, 12:13:41 PM EST

Use "Split Block" to save on cut-and-pasting. :-) -NT - (CRConrad) - (5) - Feb. 5, 2002, 12:20:40 PM EST

Eh? I don't understand the usage I guess. - (Another Scott) - (4) - Feb. 5, 2002, 12:25:31 PM EST

How "Split Block" helps cut down on cut/paste: - (CRConrad) - (3) - Feb. 5, 2002, 06:19:11 PM EST

Thanks. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Feb. 5, 2002, 06:25:52 PM EST

You're welcome! -NT - (CRConrad) - Feb. 5, 2002, 07:12:56 PM EST

Reassuring that I'm not the only one who - (Ashton) - Feb. 7, 2002, 02:24:27 AM EST

We aren't responsible for everyone. - (Ric Locke) - (12) - Feb. 5, 2002, 10:45:58 PM EST

I wasn't aware of that. - (Brandioch) - (11) - Feb. 6, 2002, 01:39:31 PM EST

Do you have some kind of religious objection... - (CRConrad) - (10) - Feb. 6, 2002, 01:55:21 PM EST

Did I miss something? - (Brandioch) - (6) - Feb. 6, 2002, 06:55:25 PM EST

Yes, you did. I refer to ALL your posts EXCEPT the one above -NT - (CRConrad) - (5) - Feb. 6, 2002, 07:09:34 PM EST

Christian, I've disagreed with you once or twice - (Ric Locke) - (4) - Feb. 6, 2002, 10:33:34 PM EST

Oh, yes.. - (Ric Locke) - Feb. 6, 2002, 11:03:32 PM EST

Since the weathervane has struck a vein and - (Ashton) - Feb. 7, 2002, 03:31:28 AM EST

Feel free to not address my points. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 7, 2002, 11:20:17 AM EST

The treaty at the end of ww2 - (boxley) - Feb. 7, 2002, 06:56:38 PM EST

Minor disagreement. - (Ashton) - (2) - Feb. 7, 2002, 02:41:26 AM EST

Sorry, but you're just plain wrong. - (CRConrad) - (1) - Feb. 7, 2002, 06:55:42 AM EST

Well..________OK, - (Ashton) - Feb. 7, 2002, 05:35:31 PM EST

Self examination... better late than never. - (marlowe) - (21) - Feb. 2, 2002, 08:54:26 AM EST

Within your digital Left/Right world - (Ashton) - (1) - Feb. 2, 2002, 04:28:49 PM EST

I can see your underwear. - (marlowe) - Feb. 4, 2002, 01:00:10 PM EST

But *what* is it you are "winning", exactly? - (CRConrad) - (18) - Feb. 3, 2002, 03:20:13 PM EST

Touchy, touchy. -NT - (marlowe) - (17) - Feb. 4, 2002, 10:23:52 AM EST

"You ruminated for two days, and came up with this?" -NT - (CRConrad) - (16) - Feb. 4, 2002, 07:01:17 PM EST

Less than a day, actually. - (marlowe) - (15) - Feb. 5, 2002, 10:42:58 AM EST

It was a *quote*, nitwit! (Recognize it, by any chance?) - (CRConrad) - (14) - Feb. 5, 2002, 11:39:04 AM EST

Ohhh, you're lots of fun! - (marlowe) - (13) - Feb. 5, 2002, 12:46:48 PM EST

Why worry now? - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Feb. 5, 2002, 05:53:14 PM EST

What an intolerant thing to say. - (marlowe) - Feb. 7, 2002, 12:37:22 PM EST

A simple "I don't have any answer" would have sufficed for U - (CRConrad) - Feb. 5, 2002, 05:54:18 PM EST

Boooooooooooooooooooooring - (pwhysall) - (9) - Feb. 5, 2002, 06:06:05 PM EST

Yeah, you're right. Sorry. - (Ric Locke) - (8) - Feb. 5, 2002, 10:48:51 PM EST

Ehh... Dunno. What's a skeg? :-) -NT - (CRConrad) - (7) - Feb. 6, 2002, 09:02:02 AM EST

Sorry. Your English is so good - (Ric Locke) - (6) - Feb. 6, 2002, 10:38:03 PM EST

It's news to me! - (Meerkat) - (2) - Feb. 6, 2002, 10:42:05 PM EST

I think the West Coast U.S. usage - (Ric Locke) - (1) - Feb. 6, 2002, 10:57:18 PM EST

Cool! Easy to tell I've never surfed :) -NT - (Meerkat) - Feb. 6, 2002, 11:04:42 PM EST

Ah, that's what I thought it might be. - (CRConrad) - (2) - Feb. 7, 2002, 07:34:14 AM EST

skeg: skank at a kegger -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 7, 2002, 06:58:38 PM EST

ROFL -NT - (Silverlock) - Feb. 8, 2002, 12:00:35 AM EST

iwethey.org

This is to prove I can paint like Titian.
64 ms