That's an explanation. Do you have a position?

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #265,379

8/18/06 11:51:51 PM

That's an explanation. Do you have a position?

Given the precepts of the US's constitution, do you think it's right or wrong for the Pres to be able to tap phones? And if it's wrong and not illegal doesn't that mean the law is wrong? If illegal (right or wrong) he should be impeached. See sig.

If it's not wrong and not illegal then I give up on democracy.

-----------------------------------------
Impeach Bush. Impeach Cheney. Do it now.

Post #265,385

8/19/06 12:06:08 AM

read me in my posts

I have said many times that Bush should be impeached
not for lying about war
not for Iraq
not for missing WMD's
but his rabid intrusion into denying American freedoms in a manner that would appall Nixon.
thanx,
bill

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep

NSA eavesdropping program ruled unconstitutional - (jbrabeck) - (17) - Aug. 17, 2006, 01:58:56 PM EDT

Woo, blunt, I like her -NT - (drewk) - (3) - Aug. 17, 2006, 02:04:06 PM EDT

Blunt, that is the legal equivalent of a bitch slap - (JayMehaffey) - (2) - Aug. 17, 2006, 02:16:16 PM EDT

We can dream, can't we? -NT - (drewk) - Aug. 17, 2006, 02:19:04 PM EDT

Expect appeal to buddies on Supreme Court - (jbrabeck) - Aug. 17, 2006, 04:13:39 PM EDT

The House will impeach her, while it can. - (a6l6e6x) - Aug. 18, 2006, 12:36:43 AM EDT

Woot! The Constitution Lives (for now...)! - (jb4) - (11) - Aug. 18, 2006, 05:30:47 PM EDT

Don't be gettin' all starry eyed. - (Silverlock) - (10) - Aug. 18, 2006, 11:26:33 PM EDT

And critics are saying the judge's arguments are weak. - (Another Scott) - (9) - Aug. 18, 2006, 11:29:38 PM EDT

dont know about the arguments - (boxley) - (6) - Aug. 18, 2006, 11:36:22 PM EDT

That's an explanation. Do you have a position? - (Silverlock) - (1) - Aug. 18, 2006, 11:51:51 PM EDT

read me in my posts - (boxley) - Aug. 19, 2006, 12:06:08 AM EDT

Ya. It wouldn't have gone to court if he hadn't ignored FISA - (Another Scott) - (3) - Aug. 19, 2006, 12:05:30 AM EDT

How many trials? - (Ashton) - (1) - Aug. 19, 2006, 02:16:48 AM EDT

Thanks. :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Aug. 19, 2006, 08:15:52 AM EDT

They don't have any real interest in fighting Al Qaeda - (Silverlock) - Aug. 19, 2006, 06:27:42 AM EDT

Would those "critics" be named Gonzalez? Cheney? Star? -NT - (jb4) - (1) - Aug. 21, 2006, 01:48:40 PM EDT

I'm sure they've got opinions... - (Another Scott) - Aug. 21, 2006, 03:03:10 PM EDT

A vacation you’ll talk about for years to come, at AA meetings.
49 ms