IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New So... it wasn't analog after all.
Early Digital Media that NASA used is even better.

Cool. The 1" is on non-shrink stratum. Whodathunkit had been digital.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
Freedom is not FREE.
Yeah, but 10s of Trillions of US Dollars?
SELECT * FROM scog WHERE ethics > 0;

0 rows returned.
New I don't think it was digital. image.
[link|http://www.honeysucklecreek.net/Apollo_11/TV_from_Moon.html|Linky]:

TV from the Moon

The television camera taken to the lunar surface was a slow-scan black and white camera with a vertical resolution of 320 lines scanned at 10 frames per second. This camera was chosen because the available bandwidth from the Moon (700kHz) was not sufficient for a standard TV signal.

On Earth, the received slow scan signal was converted to a standard TV picture (in this case, the American standard of 525 lines and 30 frames per second) using specially built scan converters. At Goldstone and Honeysuckle, the conversion was done on site. The Parkes slow scan TV signal was sent to the OTC (Overseas Telecommunications Commission) Paddington gateway exchange in Oxford Street, Paddington, in Sydney and converted there.

[...]


[link|http://www.honeysucklecreek.net/station/video.html|More]:

Ed von Renouard writes,

\ufffdfor Apollo 11 we had the M22 telemetry recorders going at 120 ips (reel change every 1/4 hr for the duration of the mission) which also recorded the narrow-band slow scan TV downlink, and we had an ageing broadcast quality Ampex VR1100 4-head desk-size video recorder with 2-inch tapes to record the scan-converted NTSC-standard output TV fed to the US. This machine overheated during the downlink and kept on blowing fuses so we ended up opening its rear doors and positioning two desk fans to keep it cool. This worked and we were able record the rest of the TV.\ufffd


Here's Ed changing a tape:

[image|http://www.honeysucklecreek.net/images/Ed_v_R_at_VTR.jpg|0|Ed changing a tape|383|358]

I think it's safe to assume all of this stuff was analog. Remember, digital recorders came along much later (when cheap integrated circuits were available).

HTH.

Cheers,
Scott.
     Moon landing tapes misplaced... - (ChrisR) - (19)
         And the reason they're talking about it now - (drewk)
         May not matter... - (jbrabeck) - (17)
             I had some that did pretty well - (drewk) - (12)
                 Tape quality was a major factor. - (Andrew Grygus)
                 My tapes were the good quality - (jbrabeck) - (6)
                     Remember the TV show Max Headroom? - (drewk)
                     Everything else was .spec'd you think... - (folkert) - (4)
                         Re: working player - (drewk) - (3)
                             SpaceDaily story with pictures. 10 kB .img - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                 So... it wasn't analog after all. - (folkert) - (1)
                                     I don't think it was digital. image. - (Another Scott)
                 '50s even.. - (Ashton) - (3)
                     I'm almost sure mom has a nice reel to reel player - (Nightowl) - (2)
                         My Dad has one, too. - (static)
                         Re: I'm almost sure mom has a nice reel to reel player - (Ashton)
             Interesting... - (jb4) - (3)
                 Maybe... - (Another Scott) - (1)
                     Sounds good. Thanx! -NT - (jb4)
                 I'd just pry it open - (drewk)

Absorbant and yellow and porous are we!
51 ms