But there's a solution.

Ex-Ambassador Richard Holbrooke (on site) and by video: Wm. Kristol

(!!)

It was fascinating (~like noticing one's own onset of nausea?) to see Kristol's perpetual fixed-in-urethane wide smirk - the rest of the face set in concrete - confront every detailed rebuttal of his litany,

"I'm not convinced..
I think there's still a chance..
maybe after 3 months or 6, we can conclude that ..."
cha cha cha

And every time Holbrooke made a particuarly stark deduction (or reminded of a K. previous propaganda piece counter to that reasoning, often in the Face of it) Kristol would trot out ... Phrase #2,

"I've always believed that ..."
essentially agreeing but invoking boilerplate-paste, "I'm not convinced.."

(What... a NeoCONman not CONvinced !?!)

It is to laugh, if one can step aside momentarily from the stark probability that, No One seems capable of finding a procedure for jailing any (or even one) of the cabal, anytime before 1/2009.

Certainly I hope that these probabilities contain a loophole; slo-mo train wrecks are riveting, but only for the first two or three. Can one become bored with disintegration.. beyond some critical mass?

Post #264,830 by Andrew Grygus 8/14/06 7:29:27 PM Reply	But there's a solution. Convict Sadam. His sentence - he must take over Iraq. [link\|http://www.aaxnet.com\|AAx]
Post #264,860 by Ashton 8/14/06 10:24:48 PM Reply	But he must take on assorted Neoconmen as street patrol cops in Fallujah. On Owl shift. I see Wolfowitz as ___ Rumsfeld (a contest - to name This post)
Post #264,894 by JayMehaffey 8/15/06 9:17:52 AM Reply	Probably not a good idea Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and Cheney would probably feel right at home in the Iraqi Baath party. Heck, with the Baath's mix of being half way between a Mafia and a Nationalist Fascist party, they would fit in fine and would probably hold high office quickly. Jay
Post #264,926 by Andrew Grygus 8/15/06 12:52:35 PM Reply	Well, better there than here. [link\|http://www.aaxnet.com\|AAx]
Post #265,009 by Ashton 8/15/06 8:28:09 PM Reply	Last night on Charlie Rose (PBS) Ex-Ambassador Richard Holbrooke (on site) and by video: Wm. Kristol (!!) It was fascinating (~like noticing one's own onset of nausea?) to see Kristol's perpetual fixed-in-urethane wide smirk - the rest of the face set in concrete - confront every detailed rebuttal of his litany, "I'm not convinced.. I think there's still a chance.. maybe after 3 months or 6, we can conclude that ..." cha cha cha And every time Holbrooke made a particuarly stark deduction (or reminded of a K. previous propaganda piece counter to that reasoning, often in the Face of it) Kristol would trot out ... Phrase #2, "I've always believed that ..." essentially agreeing but invoking boilerplate-paste, "I'm not convinced.." (What... a NeoCONman not CONvinced !?!) It is to laugh, if one can step aside momentarily from the stark probability that, No One seems capable of finding a procedure for jailing any (or even one) of the cabal, anytime before 1/2009. Certainly I hope that these probabilities contain a loophole; slo-mo train wrecks are riveting, but only for the first two or three. Can one become bored with disintegration.. beyond some critical mass? Family values in action. It's nice to know that the president sticks to his core values. How many more days until [link\|http://politicsinmudville.blogspot.com/2006_07_23_politicsinmudville_archive.html\| January 2009?]

Welcome to IWETHEY!