"Collapsed view" ?= "One post at a time"

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #262,497 by drewk 7/24/06 8:55:11 AM Reply	"Collapsed view" ?= "One post at a time" === Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link\|http://DocHope.com\|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link\|http://DocHope.com\|http://DocHope.com]
Post #262,500 by admin 7/24/06 9:00:14 AM Reply	Well, as I got to thinking about it I think it may actually be better to just leave the views alone. Yes, "Collapse threads" uses less bandwidth initially, but then you have to load the whole freaking thread to see which ones actually changed instead of just going there directly. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #262,511 by drewk 7/24/06 11:25:32 AM Reply	What's the concern? Are you worried about peak bandwidth, and greedy users slowing the site for everyone? Or total usage hitting a monthly cap for the service? === Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link\|http://DocHope.com\|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link\|http://DocHope.com\|http://DocHope.com]
Post #262,513 by Another Scott 7/24/06 11:33:13 AM Reply	And should we turn off FasterFox if we're using it? [link\|http://fasterfox.mozdev.org/faq.html#Im_a_webmaster,_how_can_I_prevent_prefetching\|FaFo FAQ - How can I prevent prefetching?] I'm not using FasterFox with Firefox at the moment, so I can't turn it off. But if FaFo might put an extra load on knight, maybe doing what the link suggests should be considered. Cheers, Scott.
Post #262,516 by admin 7/24/06 11:53:06 AM Reply	Slowing the site for everyone And for my poor fambly at home... :-P Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."

First post! - (admin) - (22) - July 23, 2006, 08:10:12 PM EDT

Seconded -NT - (bepatient) - July 23, 2006, 08:36:26 PM EDT

Well, I d'know . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (4) - July 23, 2006, 09:01:11 PM EDT

comcast scans for news and mail - (bepatient) - July 23, 2006, 09:35:53 PM EDT

We'll be ok for a bit - (admin) - (2) - July 24, 2006, 08:50:20 AM EDT

Well, it's a lot faster than it was anyway. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - July 24, 2006, 11:17:41 AM EDT

Until I accidentally kick the plug out, at least... -NT - (admin) - July 24, 2006, 11:20:11 AM EDT

youdaman - thanks. -NT - (Steve Lowe) - July 23, 2006, 09:58:08 PM EDT

P F Amazing (new thread) - (Ashton) - July 24, 2006, 01:01:11 AM EDT

Thanks -NT - (broomberg) - July 24, 2006, 02:31:43 AM EDT

Didn't even have time to start withdrawals - (jbrabeck) - (1) - July 24, 2006, 03:11:43 AM EDT

Megadittoes! -NT - (jb4) - July 24, 2006, 12:31:20 PM EDT

Zounds! We're not worthy!!! Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott) - July 24, 2006, 04:00:19 AM EDT

/huge freakin thanx -NT - (boxley) - July 24, 2006, 08:52:50 AM EDT

"Collapsed view" ?= "One post at a time" -NT - (drewk) - (4) - July 24, 2006, 08:55:11 AM EDT

Well, as I got to thinking about it - (admin) - (3) - July 24, 2006, 09:00:14 AM EDT

What's the concern? - (drewk) - (2) - July 24, 2006, 11:25:32 AM EDT

And should we turn off FasterFox if we're using it? - (Another Scott) - July 24, 2006, 11:33:13 AM EDT

Slowing the site for everyone - (admin) - July 24, 2006, 11:53:06 AM EDT

Fourthed - (jb4) - July 24, 2006, 12:29:48 PM EDT

Thanks, Scott! - (Nightowl) - July 27, 2006, 01:44:19 AM EDT

Thank you very much! -NT - (Arkadiy) - July 29, 2006, 08:55:35 AM EDT

Thanks for stepping up, Scott! -NT - (a6l6e6x) - July 30, 2006, 01:54:05 PM EDT

iwethey.org

And she wasn't kidding, either, 'cause in came the biggest, meanest looking haddock I'd ever seen come down the pike. He was covered with mussels.
44 ms