IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New World's largest flash-bang
[link|http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06096/679996-84.stm|http://www.post-gaze...096/679996-84.stm]
A traditional bomb's casing is made of metal, which shatters when the bomb explodes and provides most of the blast's killing power. The new Air Force munition is encased in a carbon-fiber composite. When the bomb goes off, the special case breaks into thousands of harmless fibers -- limiting the bomb's killing range. On the other hand, the new case fractures more easily than a metal one -- meaning the explosion is stronger close to the target. "More of the blast energy is available as blast as opposed to being absorbed in the steel case," says Dennis Baum, a special technical adviser on munitions in the Pentagon.

The inside of the bomb, which will weigh 250 pounds, is also different. Along with the traditional explosive found in most bombs, the new bomb mixes in a special dense metal powder. The initial blast propels the powder out at such speed that it is highly deadly. Then after traveling a short distance, drag and gravity cause the heavy powder to fall quickly to the ground.

The result is an explosion that is powerful and lethal, but relatively well-contained.

In tests using dummies made out of a special gel that replicates human flesh the blast obliterated everything in the bomb's immediate area, including the gauges the Air Force uses to measure the power of the blast. Scientists at Eglin Air Force base in Fort Walton Beach, Fla., where the tests were conducted, eventually had to design new, hardier pressure gauges.
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
New One small step for the Air Force
One Giant Leap for Humanity.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New Sounds even "better" than a fuel-air bomb.
now it doesn't burn it all, it pulverizes it.
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
Expand Edited by bepatient July 6, 2006, 06:05:19 PM EDT
New Not as good as a foam-air bomb.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New Weren't those outlawed after Foamaha beach?
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New Lemme check that Freedom of Infoamation Act request
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
New "thousands of harmless fibers"
That probably cause lung cancer or something.
--
Chris Altmann
New Actually it does cause cancer
a very rich person should leave his kids enough to do anything but not enough to do nothing. -- Warren Buffett
New If you are close enough to breath them
you won't need to worry about it for long.
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New Unless it's a day later of course.
You think it just magically disappears?
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New No, I think it magically disperses to non-tox levels.
You've got bigger issues with brake dust from the military vehicles in the area.
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New Oh yes, considering it it compacted metal and ceramic.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
Freedom is not FREE.
Yeah, but 10s of Trillions of US Dollars?
SELECT * FROM scog WHERE ethics > 0;

0 rows returned.
New Whachootalkinaboutwillis?
Comment was on the carbon fibre...which is a carcinogen (like everything else)
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New Um... OK.
NOT.

The M-1 does not have Carbon Fiber Brakes.

Only the Emergency halt brake it. When it grabs the things could be nealy whitehot and it'll work.

Of course, last I saw one up close was 1987. So this may have changed.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
Freedom is not FREE.
Yeah, but 10s of Trillions of US Dollars?
SELECT * FROM scog WHERE ethics > 0;

0 rows returned.
New Hrm...thought I had seen something
regarding the continued use of organic brake pads in alot of older military vehicles. that would be carbon and/or asbestos.

But, looks like they may all have shifted to semi-metallic...so maybe i overstated the brake dust thing.

How about if I say the exhaust fumes instead???

:-)
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New Depends on if the fuel is...
Low Sulfur Highway Fuel (between 500pps and 600pps), which unfortunately is not to be used in 2007 and later Diesel Motors, it may cause damage in your econo-diesel without proper pre-heating (which they are not supposed to have fuel pre-heaters)
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
Freedom is not FREE.
Yeah, but 10s of Trillions of US Dollars?
SELECT * FROM scog WHERE ethics > 0;

0 rows returned.
New So lemme get thist straight...
After 2007, we're supposed to use High Sulphur Diesel Fuel?
jb4
"So don't pay attention to the approval ratings that say 68% of Americans disapprove of the job this man is doing. I ask you this, does that not also logically mean that 68% approve of the job he's not doing? Think about it. I haven't."
Stephen Colbert, at the White House Correspondent's Dinner 29Apr06
New In 'econo-diesel's.
If you're not interested in fuel economy, you can burn whatever and however much you like. If you DO want fuel economy, you will be required to increase the amount of pollutants you produce per tankful.

See? We ARE being terraformed for the benefit of our alien masters!

Imric's Tips for Living
  • Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
  • Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
  • Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.


Nothing is as simple as it seems in the beginning,
As hopeless as it seems in the middle,
Or as finished as it seems in the end.
 
 
New Now, dammit man. You and Drew are beginning to Scare me.
Especially when you both get my train of thought right away.

Yes, you are correct Skip. More pollution for better economy of fuel.

And Yes, if you do run regular Diesel Fuel (500pps stuff) in the econo-diesels (costing an extra $3K) it will ruin them to the point of becoming "regular" diesels.

But, how does that ring with the environmentalists, more pollution for better efficency? Well, better mileage means less fuel... which means less Pollution. So you see, more pollution means less pollution because of efficency! GOTCHYA!

So see we are reducing Pollution and saving Murica money at the same time!

We must be geniuses in our own minds!
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
Freedom is not FREE.
Yeah, but 10s of Trillions of US Dollars?
SELECT * FROM scog WHERE ethics > 0;

0 rows returned.
New Congratulations, Greg!
You have now officially graduated from the Richard Cheney Memorial School of Petrologic. Your diploma and job offer from Halliburton are in the mail...
jb4
"So don't pay attention to the approval ratings that say 68% of Americans disapprove of the job this man is doing. I ask you this, does that not also logically mean that 68% approve of the job he's not doing? Think about it. I haven't."
Stephen Colbert, at the White House Correspondent's Dinner 29Apr06
New "special dense metal powder"
Gee, I wonder what that's made of.
--
Chris Altmann
New Depleted uranium?
a very rich person should leave his kids enough to do anything but not enough to do nothing. -- Warren Buffett
New Tungsten, actually
And the cancer that some critics point to is because they tested a tungsten/cobalt alloy.

[link|http://www.defensetech.org/archives/002434.html|Anonymous comment], but it sounds reasonable.
The shrapnel used in the cancer tests were "tungsten cobalt" and "tungsten cobalt nickel" alloys. Pure tungsten metal powder has been used in medicine for ages, biomedical implants, and even nutritional suplements. It is an inert element, and has never been linked to cancer.

It's interesting to note that the Gov't is stuck with Hundreds of tons of DU, Tungsten costs about 200X that of DU, and the cancer tests conspicuously avoided using pure tungsten powder (cobalt has been known to cause cancer for years, and nickel is poisonous as well).

If I mixed sugar & tobacco, had rats smoke it, then published on the resulting cancer, I could easily say "Sugar product linked with cancer." Although the effects of pure sugar smoking was never tested, I could easily say "There is much more to learn about sugar, and it's possible effects on human beings."

The spin works for everyone. The military gets to use more DU, the government spends less money, the scientist gets to do more testing because "There is much more to learn." Tungsten carbide cobalt is dangerous and there are procedures to handle the material safely.
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
New Keeper! - maybe most concise spin-recipe yet?

New ..a thread which shall live in infoamy.
Quip to a certain linguist at a University, during the party -

A Jeroboam of foam, Noam?


New You were just foaming at the mouth to use that, weren'tcha?
jb4
"So don't pay attention to the approval ratings that say 68% of Americans disapprove of the job this man is doing. I ask you this, does that not also logically mean that 68% approve of the job he's not doing? Think about it. I haven't."
Stephen Colbert, at the White House Correspondent's Dinner 29Apr06
New Pun foul! You used the word in its common meaning
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
New So you're foaming the Pun Police?!? Puh-LEEEECE!
[no that wasn't a typo, for a change...]
jb4
"So don't pay attention to the approval ratings that say 68% of Americans disapprove of the job this man is doing. I ask you this, does that not also logically mean that 68% approve of the job he's not doing? Think about it. I haven't."
Stephen Colbert, at the White House Correspondent's Dinner 29Apr06
     World's largest flash-bang - (drewk) - (27)
         One small step for the Air Force - (jake123)
         Sounds even "better" than a fuel-air bomb. - (bepatient) - (3)
             Not as good as a foam-air bomb. -NT - (admin) - (2)
                 Weren't those outlawed after Foamaha beach? -NT - (bepatient) - (1)
                     Lemme check that Freedom of Infoamation Act request -NT - (drewk)
         "thousands of harmless fibers" - (altmann) - (13)
             Actually it does cause cancer -NT - (ben_tilly)
             If you are close enough to breath them - (bepatient) - (11)
                 Unless it's a day later of course. - (jake123) - (10)
                     No, I think it magically disperses to non-tox levels. - (bepatient) - (9)
                         Oh yes, considering it it compacted metal and ceramic. -NT - (folkert) - (8)
                             Whachootalkinaboutwillis? - (bepatient) - (7)
                                 Um... OK. - (folkert) - (6)
                                     Hrm...thought I had seen something - (bepatient) - (5)
                                         Depends on if the fuel is... - (folkert) - (4)
                                             So lemme get thist straight... - (jb4) - (3)
                                                 In 'econo-diesel's. - (imric) - (2)
                                                     Now, dammit man. You and Drew are beginning to Scare me. - (folkert) - (1)
                                                         Congratulations, Greg! - (jb4)
         "special dense metal powder" - (altmann) - (3)
             Depleted uranium? -NT - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                 Tungsten, actually - (drewk) - (1)
                     Keeper! - maybe most concise spin-recipe yet? -NT - (Ashton)
         ..a thread which shall live in infoamy. - (Ashton) - (3)
             You were just foaming at the mouth to use that, weren'tcha? -NT - (jb4) - (2)
                 Pun foul! You used the word in its common meaning -NT - (drewk) - (1)
                     So you're foaming the Pun Police?!? Puh-LEEEECE! - (jb4)

Mmmmmmm.... Nemo!
220 ms