IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Linux Forum / Re: Huh?
Post #26,060
by clkennedy
1/28/02 12:22:41 PM
Reply
New Re: Huh?
The problem is in receiving mail. The line in the log that I'm having trouble deciphering is:

02627 >>> 550 5.0.0 Access denied

This is coming from sendmail on my box (listed as xyz.com). It seems that sendmail can't write something to somewhere but I'm not sure exactly what or where.

550 is an smtp error code basically saying "I can't do that" the 5.0.0 is a mystery.

As for my obstinace for sticking with sendmail -- the reasons are many and varied. I'm not going to go into it here.

Cliff
Post #26,239
by static
1/29/02 5:00:21 AM
Reply
New Oh.
I can only guess that your sendmail configuration is upset about email from netpipe.com. The 5.0.0 is probably a sendmail-specific error code. Considering all the advice so far about how to fix your problem has been to replace sendmail with something better, it doesn't look like there will be anyone who knows exactly what's wrong. Sorry.

Wade.

"All around me are nothing but fakes
Come with me on the biggest fake of all!"
Post #26,247
by pwhysall
Picture of pwhysall
1/29/02 6:22:20 AM
Reply
New On replacing sendmail
You may be interested to know that exim can be used as a drop-in replacement for sendmail.

Indeed, on my system /sbin/sendmail is actually a symlink to exim.

This mainly works around the fact that many packages on Red Hat Linux require the smtpdaemon metapackage and I can't be bothered to make an exim RPM :-)

Peter
Shill For Hire
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
     Sendmail on Linux II -- the sequel - I FIGURED IT OUT - (clkennedy) - (11) - Feb. 1, 2002, 06:05:01 PM EST
         Alternative to Sendmail - (nking) - (1) - Jan. 25, 2002, 03:56:07 PM EST
             Re: Alternative to Sendmail - (clkennedy) - Jan. 25, 2002, 04:00:39 PM EST
         By the way - (wharris2) - (1) - Jan. 25, 2002, 05:13:05 PM EST
             Re: By the way - (clkennedy) - Jan. 28, 2002, 12:23:16 PM EST
         Huh? - (static) - (3) - Jan. 27, 2002, 12:02:37 AM EST
             Re: Huh? - (clkennedy) - (2) - Jan. 28, 2002, 12:22:41 PM EST
                 Oh. - (static) - Jan. 29, 2002, 05:00:21 AM EST
                 On replacing sendmail - (pwhysall) - Jan. 29, 2002, 06:22:20 AM EST
         Re: Sendmail on Linux II -- the sequel - I FIGURED IT OUT. - (clkennedy) - (2) - Feb. 1, 2002, 06:01:28 PM EST
             Congrats! Thanks for letting us know the solution. -NT - (Another Scott) - Feb. 1, 2002, 06:02:26 PM EST
             host.allow and host.deny are there for a reason - (boxley) - Feb. 4, 2002, 01:24:32 PM EST

Hate to have a typo or spelling error made immortal by the LRPD.
39 ms