(Obsolete. Thanks, Ashton.) .imgs

Post #260,553 by Another Scott 7/1/06 8:58:32 PM 7/2/06 7:01:27 PM Reply	(Obsolete. Thanks, Ashton.) .imgs I don't see your images. I think you need to add the height and width tags. E.g. (View source of this page. Ctrl-U in Firefox.) [image\|http://www.419eater.com/images/posters/419sabotage.jpg\|\|Sabotage\|444\|347] [image\|http://www.419eater.com/images/posters/donate.jpg\|\|Donate\|444\|347] I agree that it sure looks like Rand may have inspired them. :-) Cheers, Scott. (Who now sees your images in my preveiw. Hmmm.) Edited by Another Scott July 2, 2006, 07:01:27 PM EDT Expand All History
Post #260,558 by Ashton 7/2/06 3:45:44 AM Reply	Both sets look OK in Moz suite Unclear where I'd need sizing constraints (?) Haven't used those in prev imgs. though I can see the need if object were only in 1600x1200 extravagance. Note that I used the thumbnail version on first poster; thus size difference - a sop to bandwidth-antsy dialuppers (or am I the only remaining one of Those?)
Post #260,561 by Another Scott 7/2/06 8:26:35 AM Reply	Bah. I'm getting 403s on both this morning. 45 kB .img Forbidden You don't have permission to access /images/posters/419sabotage.jpg on this server. Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request. Apache/1.3.34 Server at www.419eater.com Port 80 Years ago there was some discussion here about the way to get images to show up reliably... [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=76095\|E.g.]. I've tried to always add the Height and Width tags since then (though it's not clear if they're still needed). In several of your recent posts, I've only see the "Image" text and not the picture itself. I assumed that it was due to leaving out the tags. OBTW, in searching through the archive here, I came across [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=96936\|this]. Ashton, you might enjoy it (again). [image\|http://sfgate.com/chronicle/pictures/2003/04/16/mn_iraq3.jpg\|\|Ashtonish\|333\|500] :-) Cheers, Scott.
Post #260,574 by Ashton 7/2/06 7:14:33 PM Reply	Quite right - cache-flow gotcha Nuked cache; NG. Obv it had 'worked' for my perusal because I'd been there/cached that. :-/ Hmm - a tawdry puzzle. OK so I added only frill that DRL had added, in the Iraqi Navy pic: [border="0" alt="Image"] sans []. Still no dice. ('Course you had also specified options, so That was a superfluous stab) As they are indubitably hack-prone via the occasional.. livid 419er with fancied computer-cuth - I guess they have, among other protections - 86d external even .jpg requests via some arcane digitallery-doo. While I could host it on my free FTP space if it mattered, seems unwise to let that unheralded repository of scope-pron become ... as familiar to the masses as Paris Hilton's discarded underwear {sigh} The curious will just have to Go There.
Post #260,576 by Another Scott 7/2/06 7:50:00 PM Reply	The images are working here again. :-)

Welcome to IWETHEY!