So, how is the performance of *Z* doing? - (folkert) - (13) - June 17, 2006, 01:03:01 AM EDT
         Much better thank you. -NT - (bepatient) - June 17, 2006, 01:21:58 AM EDT
         ^ what he said. -NT - (Steve Lowe) - June 17, 2006, 01:30:01 AM EDT
         Looking much better. Thanks, much -NT - (hnick) - June 17, 2006, 08:19:46 AM EDT
         Snappiness++; thankYou++ -NT - (altmann) - June 17, 2006, 09:34:27 AM EDT
         Indeed, it's much better. Can you elaborate? 3 kB image. - (Another Scott) - (2) - June 17, 2006, 10:27:31 AM EDT
             Okay - (folkert) - (1) - June 17, 2006, 01:54:23 PM EDT
                 Ah. Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott) - June 17, 2006, 02:06:24 PM EDT
         Have refrained from participating in the Test Forum - (imqwerky) - (2) - June 17, 2006, 11:39:43 AM EDT
             I'm considering that, too - (Nightowl) - (1) - June 19, 2006, 01:29:30 AM EDT
                 Just tried Test Forum - (Nightowl) - June 19, 2006, 01:56:03 PM EDT
         Maybe a little better than usual... - (CRConrad) - June 19, 2006, 06:12:38 AM EDT
         Except for opening this thread... (!) - (jb4) - (1) - June 19, 2006, 02:00:28 PM EDT
             Odd... - (Nightowl) - June 19, 2006, 02:04:44 PM EDT