where he condemned them in the same terms he just pasted lincoln's post. Funny, nothing
Nothing at all.
If fact, the two posts I did find posited that such outright lies [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=172177|are ok because it's "propaganda"] and that the Swifties [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=170287|had absolutely no connection with Bush] (which I'm sure was posted before we found out that the Swifties were funded by Rove's political organization...I'm sure without Rove's direct knowledge or consent.
So I guess if a Repo organization distributes negative information that are proven to be lies about Demos, that that's OK in BeeP's and your world, because it's "propaganda", while if Demos distribute negative information about Repos that is acknowledged to be factual, that bad, baaad, BAAAADD because it's "partisan crap".
I'm glad I don't live in your world. I couldn't afford the chiropractic bills resulting from all the whiplash.
Ad as far as supporting the "'if ya ain't fer us yer agin' us' rhetoric", I suggest you take up MM's advice and "read me in my posts". If you do, you'll find nowhere do I subscribe to the 'if ya ain't fer us yer agin' us' camp you ascribe me to. Politicians lie. Partisan politicians lie more often. The current crop of Repo partisans appear to lie more often, in a more institutionalized way, and with less remorse than do Demos currently. I do not believe it was always that way (c.f. post-civil war era)...but I wasn't alive then, so I can't be sure. And Sam Clemmens was right.
And to the "It seems that anything that praises Dems is above reproach in your eyes." crack. Just remember the other old saw: What's good for the goose is good for the gander". In my jaundiced view, I'm pleased that the Demos are finally showing some backbone, and standing up to the 6+ years of lie and innuendo that Der TurdBlossom has orchestrated. There is, however, one notable difference in their response from that of the Repos opening salvo: The Demos are responding with facts, a concept rather foreign to the current neocon cadre. Does that make me a blind Democrat apologist? Maybe to you, perhaps, but to the rest of the world, not hardly.