IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New My belief:
I think MS is paying/encouraging big ISPs to move their parked domains to IIS. The parked domains don't add anything other than bulk since no one is actually using the domain names for sites, but they make the numbers look better.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New Last chart shows the truth
Apache is growing steadily, has been for years. MS saw a recent bump due to some marketing. The jump was too quick to represent anything other than a marketing push, probably of the strong-arm variety.

[edit] Me cant speel
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
Expand Edited by drewk June 9, 2006, 09:14:06 AM EDT
New The article actually says that you're right
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
New It doesn't say anything about payments or "encouragement".
That's strictly a supposition.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New Point, but a supposition that I'd suppose as well.
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
New The alternative doesn't work
The only alternative would be IIS being better then Apache. And that is obviously a non-starter.

It is doubly absurd when you figure in the price sensitivity of these companies. If MS isn't cutting them a deal, they would be spending a fourtune on liscensing.

Jay
New Devil's Advocate Mode: ENGAGE
The only alternative would be IIS being better then Apache. And that is obviously a non-starter.

Is it? When was the last time you seriously sat down and evaluated both servers?

IIS 4 was a dog, but there's a lot of time elapsed since then. I don't doubt that IIS6 is a swine to manage, but then again, Apache does have a config file that contains some [link|http://people.apache.org/~rbowen/presentations/apacheconEU2005/hate_apache.pdf|alarming stupidity].

We take it as an article of faith that IIS is less good than Apache, but I think it serves us well to [link|http://www.serverwatch.com/tutorials/print.php/10825_3074841_2|examine our presuppositions] and the reasons for holding them, from time to time.

It seems to me that the real downer for IIS is not the httpd itself but rather the OS platform it's tied to.


Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
Expand Edited by pwhysall June 9, 2006, 05:28:04 AM EDT
New Was that PDF one of those 5-minute presentations?
I'd love to have seen that one delivered. Last slide is frickin priceless.
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
     Big IIS gains vs. apache. - (mmoffitt) - (8)
         My belief: - (admin) - (7)
             Last chart shows the truth - (drewk)
             The article actually says that you're right -NT - (ben_tilly) - (5)
                 It doesn't say anything about payments or "encouragement". - (admin) - (4)
                     Point, but a supposition that I'd suppose as well. -NT - (ben_tilly)
                     The alternative doesn't work - (JayMehaffey) - (2)
                         Devil's Advocate Mode: ENGAGE - (pwhysall) - (1)
                             Was that PDF one of those 5-minute presentations? - (drewk)

Who invented this stupid sport, anyway?
147 ms