Is IE still on the clients' machines?

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #25,819 by altmann 1/25/02 11:52:36 PM Reply	Is IE still on the clients' machines? Are the binaries still there? Do they prevent access to IE, or just decree that it shall not be used as a general browser? What about a thin VB wrapper around the IE html control? No browser controls, just a rectangle to run the app in. -- Chris Altmann
Post #25,823 by admin 1/26/02 12:21:38 AM Reply	Unknown. But that requires that they install and support a desktop application to run the HTML. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #25,878 by nking 1/26/02 2:41:35 PM Reply	IE on client machines If they run the first version of Windows 95 before IE was bundled with it, chances are they don't have IE. Or maybe they have IE 3.0, and it does not work with the code designed to work with IE 4.0 and higher? NT 4.0 also had an earlier version of IE on it. Ah fudge, just re-write the ASP stuff in Java, it should then run on any browser that supports Java. Right? "Will code Visual BASIC for cash."
Post #25,890 by admin 1/26/02 4:17:43 PM Reply	The idea is to avoid a complete rewrite... Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."

Call for opinions: re: IE vs. Netscape vs. Citrix vs. .NET - (admin) - (39) - Jan. 25, 2002, 02:15:06 PM EST

Just to be obvious - (drewk) - (1) - Jan. 25, 2002, 02:20:37 PM EST

That will be one of the points. - (admin) - Jan. 25, 2002, 02:41:37 PM EST

This is up my alley. - (nking) - (3) - Jan. 25, 2002, 03:54:25 PM EST

Re: This is up my alley. - (admin) - (1) - Jan. 25, 2002, 05:37:31 PM EST

Alley cats - (nking) - Jan. 25, 2002, 09:24:53 PM EST

Another ? on licensing - (admin) - Jan. 25, 2002, 06:22:57 PM EST

Does it run under Mozilla? - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Jan. 25, 2002, 04:11:42 PM EST

No. - (admin) - Jan. 25, 2002, 05:08:17 PM EST

Modification effort? - (tablizer) - (1) - Jan. 25, 2002, 04:33:02 PM EST

IF statements not even necessary - (admin) - Jan. 25, 2002, 05:09:51 PM EST

Take a look at Ximian's Mono... - (kmself) - (1) - Jan. 25, 2002, 06:44:07 PM EST

Very doubtful. - (admin) - Jan. 25, 2002, 08:13:22 PM EST

Is IE still on the clients' machines? - (altmann) - (3) - Jan. 25, 2002, 11:52:36 PM EST

Unknown. - (admin) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2002, 12:21:38 AM EST

IE on client machines - (nking) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2002, 02:41:35 PM EST

The idea is to avoid a complete rewrite... -NT - (admin) - Jan. 26, 2002, 04:17:43 PM EST

My $0.02. - (Another Scott) - (9) - Jan. 26, 2002, 12:50:24 AM EST

Nicely put, or, the dentist says "this won't hurt a bit" -NT - (wharris2) - Jan. 26, 2002, 02:06:00 AM EST

Netscape 6.02... - (admin) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2002, 09:32:16 AM EST

Yr facing a psycholgcl. issue not really a technical one - (tablizer) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2002, 02:14:57 PM EST

This isn't a PHB thing. - (admin) - Jan. 26, 2002, 02:20:36 PM EST

Web Compass - (nking) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2002, 02:44:02 PM EST

It's all javascript, I've come to find out -NT - (admin) - Jan. 26, 2002, 04:18:18 PM EST

I'd agree with your solution - (tonytib) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2002, 02:59:14 PM EST

MS oriented IT people - (nking) - Jan. 26, 2002, 03:11:26 PM EST

I was wrong about the vbscript - (admin) - Jan. 26, 2002, 04:20:26 PM EST

Flat out refusal to answer... - (folkert) - (1) - Jan. 27, 2002, 04:57:19 PM EST

Refresh my memory? -NT - (admin) - Jan. 30, 2002, 09:54:15 AM EST

lets look at the ongoing maintenance costs - (boxley) - (10) - Jan. 28, 2002, 01:28:03 PM EST

You are correct - (nking) - (9) - Jan. 29, 2002, 03:22:37 PM EST

Cynical view - (wharris2) - (8) - Jan. 30, 2002, 09:26:55 AM EST

If you want to keep that view... - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Jan. 30, 2002, 09:54:15 AM EST

yes, well I'll charge him even more - (cforde) - (3) - Jan. 30, 2002, 12:16:12 PM EST

At this rate... - (ben_tilly) - Jan. 30, 2002, 02:20:49 PM EST

Good for him I'll charge less - (drewk) - (1) - Jan. 30, 2002, 02:42:10 PM EST

Too bad for you... - (ben_tilly) - Jan. 30, 2002, 09:11:45 PM EST

That is why Open Source doesn't catch on with the suits - (nking) - (2) - Jan. 30, 2002, 04:22:03 PM EST

Heh - (n3jja) - (1) - Jan. 30, 2002, 08:39:10 PM EST

Problem solving - (nking) - Jan. 31, 2002, 06:34:19 PM EST

I could be totally wrong.
105 ms