Sadly not.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #256,642 by inthane-chan 5/24/06 4:30:28 PM Reply	Sadly not. It appears there are major differences in SSL implementation between 1.3 and 2.0 thanks to a change in the design. When somebody asks you to trade your freedoms for security, it isn't your* security they're talking about.*
Post #256,647 by drewk 5/24/06 4:43:32 PM Reply	Surprised to find this [link\|http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/misc/FAQ.html#SSL-i\|Why doesn't Apache include SSL?] I know I used to use it, and thought there was a good tutorial on their site for it. Maybe that's changed in the last two years or so. === Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link\|http://DocHope.com\|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link\|http://DocHope.com\|http://DocHope.com]

Converting a site to use SSL - (inthane-chan) - (3) - May 24, 2006, 02:59:27 PM EDT

This might help. - (admin) - (2) - May 24, 2006, 03:04:01 PM EDT

Sadly not. - (inthane-chan) - (1) - May 24, 2006, 04:30:28 PM EDT

Surprised to find this - (drewk) - May 24, 2006, 04:43:32 PM EDT

You take my saffron now you got to pay.
80 ms