SECURITY: Remote expoit in SSH 3.0

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #2,560 by admin 7/21/01 4:28:34 PM Reply	SECURITY: Remote expoit in SSH 3.0 [link\|http://www.securityfocus.com/frames/?content=/templates/archive.pike%3Flist%3D1%26start%3D2001-07-15%26threads%3D0%26mid%3D198404%26fromthread%3D0%26end%3D2001-07-21%26\|Remote Exploit] Any password can be used to ssh into accounts without passwords (listed as NP on Solaris or !! under Linux sometimes). Get ssh 3.0.1 at [link\|http://www.ssh.com\|ssh.com]. Regards, -scott anderson
Post #2,570 by boxley 7/21/01 8:44:04 PM 7/21/01 8:44:45 PM Reply	wow I hope this is widely diseminated this could affect lots of systems. Remember dont rely on just one tool, use tcp wrappers, radius as well as turn off unneeded services and check logs daily. thanx, bill can I have my ones and zeros back? Edited by boxley July 21, 2001, 08:44:45 PM EDT Expand All History
Post #2,572 by a6l6e6x 7/21/01 9:09:37 PM Reply	Thanks! I've passed the link to local LUG. Alex This is my sig. There's another almost like it, but this one is mine.
Post #2,601 by static 7/22/01 8:59:40 PM Reply	I don't think it applies to OpenSSH. My first thought when I saw the URL was "hang on - that's not OpenSSH's domain". OpenSSH's latest version is 2.9, so this bug isn't for [link\|http://www.openssh.org/\|OpenSSH]. Wade. "All around me are nothing but fakes Come with me on the biggest fake of all!"

SECURITY: Remote expoit in SSH 3.0 - (admin) - (3) - July 21, 2001, 04:28:34 PM EDT

wow I hope this is widely diseminated - (boxley) - July 21, 2001, 08:44:45 PM EDT

Thanks! I've passed the link to local LUG. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - July 21, 2001, 09:09:37 PM EDT

I don't think it applies to OpenSSH. - (static) - July 22, 2001, 08:59:40 PM EDT

iwethey.org

Well, from then on, we had a whale of a time. I took her to dinner, I took her to dance. I bought her a bouquet of flounders. And then I went home with her. And what did I get for my trouble? A case of the clams.
202 ms