IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New who programs the computer?
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep
New adminiScott!
Just as long as it is not Diebold, and the source code is available for public (that's me, folks!) inspection, I don't much care.
jb4
"So don't pay attention to the approval ratings that say 68% of Americans disapprove of the job this man is doing. I ask you this, does that not also logically mean that 68% approve of the job he's not doing? Think about it. I haven't."
Stephen Colbert, at the White House Correspondent's Dinner 29Apr06
New The algorithm would have to be public
The algorith used would have be public. And once that is done, it really doesn't matter who provides the program to the government, as the result will be tested by outside groups.

The real trick is writing up an algorithm that is fair, deterministic and effective. Fair in the sense that it doesn't bias the layout towards any party, that would be fairly easy. Deterministic in that given the same input map and population data it will always produce the same layout, making independent verification possible. Effective in that the district map would be understandable and simple.

Jay
     Weird proposal to allow DC a vote in the House. - (Another Scott) - (26)
         Obviously setup to keep the balance. - (JayMehaffey) - (24)
             Permanently at large congress members could be good - (ben_tilly) - (23)
                 I don't like that idea. - (Another Scott) - (6)
                     An at large must pander to the strident majority - (boxley) - (1)
                         ? That's not the way it works in DC. - (Another Scott)
                     I don't like it, either - (jb4) - (3)
                         who programs the computer? -NT - (boxley) - (2)
                             adminiScott! - (jb4)
                             The algorithm would have to be public - (JayMehaffey)
                 Making them all at large might be OK - (JayMehaffey) - (15)
                     Don't tell me...you're an Engineer, right? -NT - (jb4)
                     Alaska is a perfect example of why that doesnt work - (boxley) - (13)
                         See Another Scott's comments about DC - (ben_tilly) - (10)
                             must be missing something - (boxley) - (9)
                                 Yes, you must :-) - (ben_tilly) - (8)
                                     And then you can have NC's 12th Congressional district. - (a6l6e6x) - (1)
                                         True dat, but... - (ben_tilly)
                                     doesnt work that way - (boxley) - (5)
                                         How many "at large" votes does each person have? - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                                             if you have 2 at large seats ya have one vote for both seats - (boxley) - (2)
                                                 One vote per seat works IF - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                                                     You OBVIOUSLY don't live in Chicago.... -NT - (jb4)
                                         Problem is *not enough* at -large seats - (drewk)
                         Which is why I don't both house to be that way - (JayMehaffey) - (1)
                             Right now neither house has proportional distribution -NT - (ben_tilly)
         Looks less likely it'll happen this year. - (Another Scott)

I finally caught it when it tried to drink from my used bong and fell in.
47 ms