IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Et tu, AOL?
[link|http://news.com.com/2100-1001-821834.html|Kettle says pot is black, too]

Excerpt:

Microsoft's Wednesday filing fires a hefty salvo at AOL, alleging that the media giant refused to disclose subpoenaed information, while lobbying the nine litigating states on developing a proposed remedy.

"We filed this motion because AOL repeatedly refused to cooperate, even though the court instructed everyone to do so," said Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler. "AOL can't have it both ways. Their uncooperative attitude on document production stands in stark contrast to their active, behind-the-scenes involvement with the non-settling states."

Microsoft also alleges that AOL submitted to the nine non-settling states a 39-page "preferred remedy."

"AOL's proposal bears a striking resemblance to the requested relief that the non-settling States ultimately filed with the Court on December 7, 2001," the brief charges.

AOL spokesman John Buckley said, "We're not going to dignify this with a response."

I say:

A pox on both their houses.
[link|http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe/index.html|http://www.angelfir...e/index.html]
Sometimes "tolerance" is just a word for not dealing with things.
New Agreed, a pox on them both.
Who needs either of them? let them duke it out and see who has the best dishonest lawyers?

"Will code Visual BASIC for cash."
     Netscape sues Microsoft again - (marlowe) - (7)
         Oh, silly me. - (marlowe)
         Netscape is the plaintif, not DoJ - (drewk)
         This is civil...and made possible by DOJ - (bepatient)
         Cool. Who's next? - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
             What hear about the CA class action suit? - (Ashton)
         Et tu, AOL? - (marlowe) - (1)
             Agreed, a pox on them both. - (nking)

Happy strategic planning.
30 ms