Yup. Remember Ford pardoning Nixon.

Post #252,931 by Another Scott 4/21/06 5:43:12 PM Reply	Yup. Remember Ford pardoning Nixon. [link\|http://www.watergate.info/ford/pardon-proclamation.shtml\|Watergate.info]: Now, THEREFORE, I, GERALD R. FORD, President of the United States, pursuant to the pardon power conferred upon me by Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, have granted and by these presents do grant a full, free, and absolute pardon unto Richard Nixon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 20, 1969 through August 9, 1974. I suspect, though, that if Bush grants any pardons to people in his administration it'll be on his last day in office. He doesn't want to give his opponents more ammunition of that type before any elections if he doesn't have to. Cheers, Scott.
Post #252,936 by Andrew Grygus 4/21/06 5:54:52 PM Reply	And then, as we saw with OJ and others . . . . . it's time to start filing the civil suits. [link\|http://www.aaxnet.com\|AAx]
Post #252,952 by a6l6e6x 4/21/06 9:24:49 PM Reply	Well, the impeachment trial hadn't started, so one could consider the pardon as part of a "pre-trial" plea agreement. Of course, that was not publically known until Ford did pardon Nixon. Nixon's agreement to resign could well be considered an admission of guilt. As a general matter, in clemency cases [link\|http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/pardons3.htm\|the correctness of the underlying conviction is assumed], and the question of guilt or innocence is not generally at issue. But, IANAL. Alex When fascism comes to America, it'll be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross. -- Sinclair Lewis
Post #252,953 by ben_tilly 4/21/06 9:36:26 PM Reply	Impeachment cannot be pardoned The Constitution [link\|http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/article02/\|reads], ...and he shall have Power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. However they could try him for various other crimes, so the pardon was not without effect. Cheers, Ben I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Post #253,010 by a6l6e6x 4/22/06 10:21:07 AM Reply	That does make sense. Alex When fascism comes to America, it'll be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross. -- Sinclair Lewis
Post #253,043 by drewk 4/22/06 10:31:56 PM Reply	Nit: Impeachment isn't a verdict, it's a procedure Saying that you want to "pardon an impeachment" is like saying you want to "pardon a trial". Besides, a decision in an impeachment doesn't really say you were found to have done something illegal. It is a purely political process for removing someone from office, for actions that may or may not have been legal. IANAL but that's how I understand it. === Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link\|http://DocHope.com\|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link\|http://DocHope.com\|http://DocHope.com]
Post #253,051 by ChrisR 4/22/06 11:05:29 PM Reply	Impeachment removes a President from office... ...so that they can stand trial. Impeachment would be more like a grand jury. Which brings up the question of whether an impeached president that was found not guilty in the subsequent trial. Could said President try to reclaim office?
Post #253,053 by dbishop 4/22/06 11:30:58 PM Reply	Not quite From [link\|http://www.law.cornell.edu/background/impeach/\|Legal Information Institute's Backgrounder on Impeachment]: The House of Representatives considers and debates the articles of impeachment. A majority vote of the entire House is required to pass each article. Once an article is approved, the President is, technically speaking, "impeached" -- that is subject to trial in the Senate. So "impeached" roughly means "indicted". It just means that there will be a trial in the senate. If that trial yields a "not guilty" verdict, the president doesn't have to reclaim office, as he was never removed from office. Although, from the same link as above: Technically, impeachment is the Senate's quasi-criminal proceeding instituted to remove a public officer, not the actual act of removal. Most references to impeachment, however, encompass the entire process, beginning with the House's impeachment inquiry.
Post #253,054 by Another Scott 4/22/06 11:33:56 PM 4/23/06 12:03:11 AM Reply	Not quite right. They're only removed from office on conviction. Impeachment is a formal list of charges, yes, like an indictment. But impeachment has no sanction - only conviction does. Johnson and Clinton were [link\|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment\|impeached] in the House. They weren't convicted in the Senate. They were not removed from office. Cheers, Scott. Edited by Another Scott April 23, 2006, 12:03:11 AM EDT Expand All History
Post #253,057 by dbishop 4/22/06 11:45:12 PM 4/22/06 11:45:49 PM Reply	nevermind Edited by dbishop April 22, 2006, 11:45:49 PM EDT Expand All History
Post #253,065 by Andrew Grygus 4/23/06 12:30:43 AM Reply	Yeah, Senate Republicans decided that . . . . . Clinton's definition of "is" had more long term value than a conviction would. [link\|http://www.aaxnet.com\|AAx]
Post #253,067 by Another Scott 4/23/06 12:36:18 AM Reply	If that was their thinking, ... they were probably right. It's hard to imagine Bush winning against Gore if Clinton had been removed, considering the [link\|http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/20/impeachment.poll/\|approval ratings Clinton had at the time]: December 20, 1998 Web posted at: 10:48 p.m. EST (0348 GMT) (AllPolitics, December 20) -- In the wake of the House of Representatives' approval of two articles of impeachment, Bill Clinton's approval rating has jumped 10 points to 73 percent, the latest CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll shows. That's not only an all-time high for Clinton, it also beats the highest approval rating President Ronald Reagan ever had. At the same time, the number of Americans with an unfavorable view of the Republican Party has jumped 10 points; less than a third of the country now has a favorable view of the GOP. Emphasis added. Cheers, Scott. (Who had forgotten that little emphasized tidbit.)
Post #253,013 by Silverlock 4/22/06 11:08:23 AM Reply	And Poppa Bush pardoning a bunch [link\|http://www.nytimes.com/books/97/06/29/reviews/iran-pardon.html?_r=1&oref=slogin\|Remember Iran Contra?] ----------------------------------------- Impeach Bush. Impeach Cheney. Do it now.

Welcome to IWETHEY!