When 6 Sigma doesn't apply to IT projects - (dbishop) - (16) - April 20, 2006, 10:41:00 PM EDT
         Well, on the flipside of this... - (folkert) - April 21, 2006, 10:08:05 AM EDT
         Don't knock it quite so quickly - (ben_tilly) - (12) - April 21, 2006, 07:31:52 PM EDT
             Answering both you and Greg - (dbishop) - (11) - April 22, 2006, 10:53:33 PM EDT
                 That's not my understanding. - (Another Scott) - (2) - April 22, 2006, 11:29:35 PM EDT
                     I didn't say there's no place for it - (dbishop) - (1) - April 22, 2006, 11:41:47 PM EDT
                         Good points. -NT - (Another Scott) - April 23, 2006, 12:09:52 AM EDT
                 Measure what you want to improve - (ben_tilly) - (7) - April 23, 2006, 02:36:02 AM EDT
                     And that should be cost or revenue - (dbishop) - (4) - April 23, 2006, 09:26:37 PM EDT
                         As I recall, at IBM, peer code reviews to catch - (a6l6e6x) - April 23, 2006, 10:23:29 PM EDT
                         You misremember that article - (ben_tilly) - (2) - April 23, 2006, 10:28:30 PM EDT
                             Do you think everyone not you is stupid? - (dbishop) - (1) - April 23, 2006, 11:51:37 PM EDT
                                 No. Only when they ignore important stuff. - (ben_tilly) - April 24, 2006, 02:09:32 AM EDT
                     Many elements of software development are stochastic - (dws) - (1) - April 24, 2006, 01:02:43 AM EDT
                         One must keep balance. - (ben_tilly) - April 24, 2006, 02:19:59 AM EDT
         Let's start again. - (Another Scott) - (1) - April 24, 2006, 12:24:29 AM EDT
             Your point #2 is pretty much my whole point - (dbishop) - April 24, 2006, 09:05:01 PM EDT