IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Here or humor?
[link|http://www.washingtontimes.com/commentary/20060404-085855-3240r.htm|http://www.washingto...-085855-3240r.htm]

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Surveys galore have shown that somewhere around 90 percent of the writers, editors and other personnel in the news media are Democrats and only about 10 percent are Republicans. We depend on the news media for information about government and politics, foreign affairs and war, public policy and demographic trends -- for a picture of the world around us. But the news comes from people 90 percent of whom are on one side of the political divide. Doesn't sound like an ideal situation.
Of course, a lot of people in the news business say it doesn't make any difference. I remember a conversation I had with a broadcast news executive many years ago.
"Doesn't the fact that 90 percent of your people are Democrats affect your work product?" I asked.
"Oh, no, no," he said. "Our people are professional. They have standards of objectivity and professionalism, so that their own views don't affect the news."
"So what you're saying," I said, "is that your work product would be identical if 90 percent of your people were Republicans."
He quickly replied, "No, then it would be biased."
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

------

179. I will not outsource core functions.
--
[link|http://omega.med.yale.edu/~pcy5/misc/overlord2.htm|.]

New the owners are all republicans or squirrels
They do affect the work product. So called news media in question, some large daily papers, 2 of the 3 broadcast media and 2 out of dozens of cable media are dwarfed by talk radio, blogs, boards etc. If 90% of the news is not left biased, that would mean that fox viewership is less than 10% somehow the ratings dont reflect that.
thanx,
bill
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep
New Not 90% of media
90% of people in major media outlets.

------

179. I will not outsource core functions.
--
[link|http://omega.med.yale.edu/~pcy5/misc/overlord2.htm|.]

New define major media outlet by readership
viewership and provide some numbers, they be small. More people read the xinhua news service than reuters you know :-)
thanx,
bill
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep
New You'd never know it by the softball coverage
of the greatest criminal seizure of power and threat to human rights in our nation's history since McCarthy.



[link|http://www.blackbagops.net|Black Bag Operations Log]

[link|http://www.objectiveclips.com|Artificial Intelligence]

[link|http://www.badpage.info/seaside/html|Scrutinizer]
New ..and that's not even a slight exaggeration.

New Problem with those surveys
What's the political affiliation of the owners of the media outlets? And multiply that figure by the relative influence the owner has to the influence the writers have.
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
New Two word answer: Sinclair Broadcasting. 'Nuf said!
jb4
"Every Repbulican who wants to defend Bush on [the expansion of Presidential powers], should be forced to say, 'I wouldn't hesitate to see President Hillary Rodham Clinton have the same authority'."
&mdash an unidentified letter writer to Newsweek on the expansion of executive powers under the Bush administration
New One other thing to consider.
90% of the employees are Democrats, no?

So, what portion of stories about politics that actually make it into print are written by said Democrats? That would be an interesting number to look at...

And no, I'm not speculating what that number would be.
When somebody asks you to trade your freedoms for security, it isn't your security they're talking about.
     Here or humor? - (Arkadiy) - (8)
         the owners are all republicans or squirrels - (boxley) - (4)
             Not 90% of media - (Arkadiy) - (3)
                 define major media outlet by readership - (boxley)
                 You'd never know it by the softball coverage - (tuberculosis) - (1)
                     ..and that's not even a slight exaggeration. -NT - (Ashton)
         Problem with those surveys - (drewk)
         Two word answer: Sinclair Broadcasting. 'Nuf said! -NT - (jb4)
         One other thing to consider. - (inthane-chan)

Pasteurized.
310 ms