time and space story - (boxley) - (26) - April 6, 2006, 12:04:14 PM EDT
         No reason to think you can go backwards - (drewk) - (25) - April 6, 2006, 12:20:35 PM EDT
             General relativity allows backwards time travel - (ben_tilly) - (24) - April 7, 2006, 03:12:00 AM EDT
                 The article addressed that - (drewk) - (23) - April 7, 2006, 03:35:23 AM EDT
                     Point missed - (ben_tilly) - (22) - April 7, 2006, 11:32:03 AM EDT
                         Your faith is touching - (drewk) - (21) - April 7, 2006, 11:47:11 AM EDT
                             The point still stands - (ben_tilly) - (20) - April 7, 2006, 01:01:35 PM EDT
                                 We just place the bar at different points - (drewk) - (19) - April 7, 2006, 01:15:24 PM EDT
                                     You were criticizing general relativity, not string theory - (ben_tilly) - (18) - April 8, 2006, 12:21:14 PM EDT
                                         We have measured the distance to over 8000 stars: Parallax. - (Another Scott) - (1) - April 8, 2006, 12:50:08 PM EDT
                                             But only indirectly - (ben_tilly) - April 8, 2006, 03:03:09 PM EDT
                                         Show me where I did that? - (drewk) - (15) - April 8, 2006, 03:45:44 PM EDT
                                             OK... - (ben_tilly) - (14) - April 8, 2006, 05:59:22 PM EDT
                                                 Like I said, we just set the bar at different levels - (drewk) - (13) - April 8, 2006, 07:00:03 PM EDT
                                                     Yet you believe that stars are lighted by fusion and... - (ben_tilly) - (12) - April 8, 2006, 11:08:06 PM EDT
                                                         Now you're telling me what I believe? - (drewk) - (11) - April 9, 2006, 11:54:54 AM EDT
                                                             And I was right, too! - (ben_tilly) - (10) - April 9, 2006, 02:33:05 PM EDT
                                                                 I'll simplify - (drewk) - (9) - April 9, 2006, 03:39:14 PM EDT
                                                                     I'll complexify - (ben_tilly) - (8) - April 9, 2006, 03:48:23 PM EDT
                                                                         I'll simplify some more - (drewk) - (7) - April 9, 2006, 04:00:01 PM EDT
                                                                             I have to read the article to disagree with you? why? -NT - (boxley) - (1) - April 9, 2006, 06:28:40 PM EDT
                                                                                 The specific disagreement he made, yes - (drewk) - April 9, 2006, 06:39:44 PM EDT
                                                                             But.... - (broomberg) - (2) - April 9, 2006, 06:49:21 PM EDT
                                                                                 That'll work, but kind of hard to *perform* that experiment -NT - (drewk) - (1) - April 9, 2006, 07:04:46 PM EDT
                                                                                     It's been done. - (Another Scott) - April 9, 2006, 08:01:19 PM EDT
                                                                             This is getting silly - (ben_tilly) - April 10, 2006, 12:03:10 AM EDT
                                                                             Still, in Bertie's words - - (Ashton) - April 10, 2006, 05:49:36 AM EDT